UX designers must be prepared to adapt to new policies in the design world by constantly evolving. Despite the continuous changes, we should avoid jumping from trend to trend too carelessly.
Design frameworks exist to aid in restructuring the overall design process, and many have been around for years. These frameworks are time-tested — why not learn them so you can turn to these principles when you need a strong foundation for your design decisions?
A UI/UX framework is a guide that allows designers to make and scale successful designs. Frameworks serve as guiding principles from which designers can draw inspiration. Besides driving designers to make the right design choices, they also explore user interactions with design. Frameworks were designed to allow both physical and digital products to be designed effectively.
A UX design framework provides a framework for organizing your thoughts as a designer. It assists you in ensuring that you are considering all of the critical factors when designing your product. A good UX design framework will assist you in developing designs that are both functional and visually appealing to users.
A clear and concise framework to work within is one of the most important aspects of any user experience design. This enables designers to share a common understanding of a project’s goals and objectives, ensuring everyone on the team is on the same page. A UX design framework can also assist in keeping designs on track and ensuring that they meet the needs and expectations of the users. There are numerous frameworks available, but they all share some common characteristics.
As you must have heard countless times, the design process is not rigid or a fixed law. Designers and design organizations can pick frameworks that work well for them and combine two frameworks as long as it allows them to solve their design problems.
A user-centered design framework is centered on the users. You can create solutions that make users happy by developing empathy and understanding of their needs.
As a designer, you must meet product requirements and business goals; create usable, valuable products; and improve the overall user experience. This framework focuses on that last point, arguing that focusing on the user helps your team meet business goals and create valuable products.
Adopting a user-centered design framework involves focusing on who will use the product, which tasks they must complete, how we can make the process seamless, where they will use this product, which needs are being addressed, and so on. The user-centered framework has four steps:
UCD usually takes a long time. Conducting user interviews, usability testing, and design iterations can all lengthen project timelines and increase costs, particularly for projects with limited resources or tight deadlines. Even when using a user-centered approach, designers’ biases can have an impact on design decisions made throughout the process.
This framework has the advantage of actively involving users throughout the design process, which increases the likelihood of producing products and services that meet their expectations. The needs and preferences of users are central to the UCD process. Designers can create interfaces and experiences that are intuitive, efficient, and enjoyable for users by understanding their behaviors, goals, and pain points.
Agile methodology is a strategic process adopted mainly by software teams, and new product development teams are beginning to buy into it to manage complexity. It combines two common product development strategies: Agile methodology and design thinking.
Agile software development is an iterative and incremental approach that delivers working software in short, frequent iterations. In contrast, design thinking is a problem-solving approach that centers the design process on the user. Together, they both foster cross-functional collaboration and continuous iteration.
Some advantages of this model include:
This combination indicates both efficient development and a user-centric approach to design. The disadvantages associated with this framework can be a conflict of interest, considering that Agile and design thinking methods have different timelines for deliverables. Also, there can be complexity in the learning curve as both designers and developers have to learn new frameworks.
If we didn’t discuss design thinking, we’d be missing the backbone of the UI/UX field. It is one of the most crucial frameworks for developing functional, usable, and customer-focused goods and services.
This framework has the advantage of actively involving users in the design process. This strengthens the designers’ ability to track user needs and understand their problems.
Most UX frameworks and workflows are built on the principles of design thinking, and every UX designer worldwide learns this framework when they study UX design.
The design thinking process is an iterative, user-focused framework with five stages:
Lean UX advocates creating only the features needed to test and validate assumptions. This approach helps to avoid wasting time and resources on features that aren’t necessary and instead focuses on delivering value quickly. This framework is based on developing hypotheses about user behavior, needs, or solutions and then designing experiments to validate or disprove those hypotheses.
As a designer, you can learn through data-driven insights and adjust the design as needed. Throughout the design process, Lean UX emphasizes ongoing user research and testing. It encourages designers to consult with users early and often to gain insights and validate assumptions. Lean UX emphasizes achieving desired outcomes and measuring success based on key metrics and user behavior rather than focusing solely on delivering specific design outputs.
The advantages of this framework are that it is very data-driven, user-focused, and fast to deliver, but this can also have a shortcoming. Because Lean UX is iterative and experimental, it can take time to predict project timelines and outcomes. This can be difficult for teams or organizations that rely on strict deadlines or budgets.
Atomic design is a mental model that helps us think of our user interfaces as a complete unit and a collection of parts simultaneously. Begin by designing atoms and work up to templates and pages while keeping the building principle in mind. It’s always a good idea to start small.
Atomic design is simple to use. Once we’ve done the above, all that remains is for us to combine it and work with it. It is always beneficial to begin by mapping out the foundational elements, i.e., atoms, and then building your system around them. Atomic design is a methodology comprised of five distinct stages that work together to create more deliberate and hierarchical interface design systems.
The five stages of Atomic design are as follows:
Atomic design encourages the development of modular and reusable components, allowing designers and developers to efficiently build interfaces by assembling predesigned atoms and molecules. This increases consistency and decreases redundancy in design and development efforts.
A downside to this is that managing an Atomic design-based design system can take time, especially as the number of components and their variations grows. Careful documentation, versioning, and governance are required to ensure consistency and avoid inconsistencies or duplication.
Component-based design is a web design approach that begins with creating components suitable for your content to create a library of reusable content blocks that will always stay in style.
Designers have embraced open web technology and standards in recent years, and we have prioritized reusability in our work. This is accomplished by putting in place a component-based framework.
Component-based design involves creating a system from predefined components and given requirements. Building systems from components is essential in any engineering discipline.
The component-based page structure enables your marketing and communications teams to format their content in a very flexible and elegant manner that is specific to the content. When presenting a wide range of content, page templates tend to be more rigid and limiting — every case study is set up and structured the same way, every industry page is structured the same way, and so on.
A component-based system is far more adaptable. Any desired layout or component can be implemented on any page to ensure that the content shines through. Component-based design frameworks are methodologies or approaches that focus on designing and building user interfaces using modular components.
These frameworks encourage the reuse of predesigned, self-contained components to create consistent, scalable, and efficient user interfaces. Component-based design frameworks make the development process more manageable by separating interfaces into reusable building blocks that can be easily assembled and combined to create complex user interfaces. Designers can create style sheets or follow design systems with predesigned components.
Here are some existing examples of component-based design frameworks for developers:
Component-based design frameworks encourage the development of reusable components that can be used in multiple projects. This results in less redundancy and a more consistent design. Also, by leveraging prebuilt components, developers can accelerate the development process.
This framework’s initial setup and configuration are disadvantageous. Using a component-based framework might require additional initial configuration and setup steps. This includes the time-consuming tasks of installing dependencies, configuring build tools, and establishing project structures.
Another disadvantage is performance overload. A performance overhead may be associated with rendering and managing many parts, depending on how components are implemented and used. Careful optimization and performance profiling may be required to address any performance issues.
Google’s Material Design is a design system and visual language. It offers a set of guidelines, principles, and components for developing consistent and visually appealing user interfaces across multiple platforms and devices. Material Design aims to emulate the behavior and appearance of physical materials to create a tangible, tactile, and intuitive user experience.
These are some Material Design elements to consider:
A disadvantage of this framework is that, due to the strict adherence to Material Design guidelines, the level of customization and uniqueness in the interface design may be limited. Predefined styles and components may be restrictive for projects requiring a highly customized or distinctive visual identity.
Also, Material Design was created for Android applications and has spread to other platforms. While adaptable to other operating systems, Material Design interfaces may have a more substantial visual association with Android, which may or may not align with the desired platform aesthetics.
The main advantage is the use of bold colors, typography, and visual hierarchy in Material Design. The emphasis on material-inspired motion and animations enhances the user experience by adding depth and interactivity. It also includes inbuilt elements and design patterns that allow designers and developers to create interfaces more quickly. The availability of ready-to-use components reduces UI development time and effort.
Choosing a framework requires understanding the problem’s complexity, people, resources, and the organization’s culture. Knowing the proper framework to use sets you on a path to success.
Here are a few things to consider while selecting a framework:
Other key steps are to evaluate usability, performance, and aesthetics:
Careful planning, coordination, and attention to critical considerations are required to implement and integrate UX design frameworks. Here are some tips that can help you:
These examples show how various companies have used frameworks and design systems to deliver successful, user-centric UX design projects. Each framework has distinct features and capabilities, allowing organizations to design innovative and engaging user interfaces tailored to their specific requirements.
Material UI is a popular React component library that adheres to Google’s Material Design principles. It provides a wide range of prebuilt UI components and the tools developers need to implement the Material Design aesthetic. Many successful projects have used Material UI to create visually appealing and use -friendly experiences, such as redesigning the Gmail interface.
Salesforce, a leading customer relationship management platform, launched the Salesforce Lightning Design System. It is built with web components and includes a library of reusable components and design patterns. Thanks to the design system, which also allows for customization, Salesforce has maintained a consistent user experience across its suite of products.
IBM’s Carbon Design System incorporates an Atomic design framework. Carbon provides extensive guidelines, components, and patterns that adhere to the atomic structure. It enables IBM teams to design consistent and scalable user interfaces for their enterprise software products.
Funding is essential to implementing UX frameworks; UX projects require research and testing. The incorporation of these frameworks into design processes has the potential to accelerate innovation. Organizations can unlock the potential for streamlined workflows, improved collaboration, and the delivery of exceptional user experiences by embracing UX frameworks. Finally, the proper UX framework enables teams to create products and interfaces that meet user expectations and drive business success in an ever-changing digital landscape. Why not talk with your team about the framework you use?
LogRocket lets you replay users' product experiences to visualize struggle, see issues affecting adoption, and combine qualitative and quantitative data so you can create amazing digital experiences.
See how design choices, interactions, and issues affect your users — get a demo of LogRocket today.
It’s lesser known, but brands simplify decision-making for users who settle for “good enough” instead of the perfect choice. In this blog, I do a thorough analysis of what brands use satisficing and how, and which ones don’t.
Adobe XD is Adobe’s version of Figma – but does it match up? This blog is an attempt at decoding the good and bad of both, and figuring out which one is best used for which use case.
Subscription pages are meant for users and businesses, and they should work well for both parties. This blog is a thorough discussion of what’s best and what’s not when it comes to designing subscription pages.
Call it what it is. Product designers and UX designers have unique roles, even if their titles often get swapped. In this blog, know the difference and own your expertise.
Learn more →
