2021-11-25
2386
#react
Chak Shun Yu
78806
Nov 25, 2021 ⋅ 8 min read

How to write more readable React code

Chak Shun Yu A software engineer with a current focus on frontend and React, located in the Netherlands.

Recent posts:

The different ways to use CSS :has(), with examples

The CSS :has() pseudo-class is a powerful new feature that lets you style parents, siblings, and more – writing cleaner, more dynamic CSS with less JavaScript.

Daniel Schwarz
Oct 24, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

Kombai AI: The AI agent built for frontend development

Kombai AI converts Figma designs into clean, responsive frontend code. It helps developers build production-ready UIs faster while keeping design accuracy and code quality intact.

Jude Miracle
Oct 23, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

The Replay (10/22/25): AI-assisted coding, Wasm 3.0, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 22nd issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 22, 2025 ⋅ 29 sec read
Where AI-assisted coding accelerates development — and where it doesn’t

Where AI-assisted coding accelerates development — and where it doesn’t

John Reilly discusses how software development has been changed by the innovations of AI: both the positives and the negatives.

John Reilly
Oct 22, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

One Reply to "How to write more readable React code"

  1. Not sure I agree with a for loop over reduce.

    First I don’t think the list for things you have to keep in mind is correct. Why are you thinking about the previous value? If you’re doing that then you’re thinking about things being combined in a linear fashion which isn’t great. You should be thinking with pure functions when using functional methods.

    Also with the order – you already have the lengths and the limits. It’s the length of the array. It’s baked in. You get that for free. So the only thing with order is declaring the initial state. That’s also easy, just declare the variable first like you would with a for loop and pass it in if that’s the issue. But there is also a bonus with reduce – it takes a function. That means you can move that function out and just use a name. `ids.reduce(addItemToObject, {})`.

    The issue with a for loop is it can do anything. With reduce you are already hinting at what you want to do (i.e. reduce an array). The other factor that comes in is that with reduce you are expected to use a pure function (if you’re not then that’s a whole other issue). That takes a lot of context out of the equation, whereas a for loop can be using context from anywhere. So the only thing that is weird about it is the order.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now