2021-11-25
2386
#react
Chak Shun Yu
78806
Nov 25, 2021 ⋅ 8 min read

How to write more readable React code

Chak Shun Yu A software engineer with a current focus on frontend and React, located in the Netherlands.

Recent posts:

Using Rust And Axum To Build A Jwt Authentication Api

Using Rust and Axum to build a JWT authentication API

Learn to build a basic JWT authentication system with Rust and Axum, including setting up the routes, handlers, and the middleware system.

Eze Sunday
May 29, 2024 ⋅ 9 min read
Building A Customizable Dashboard With Dashy

Building a customizable dashboard with Dashy

Dashy helps us create beautiful, customizable, modern dashboard pages with web service links and widgets.

Shalitha Suranga
May 29, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Winterjs Vs Bun: Comparing Javascript Runtimes

WinterJS vs. Bun: Comparing JavaScript runtimes

WinterJS is theoretically the fastest WinterCG JavaScript runtime. Let’s compare WinterJS to Bun, another runtime known for its speed.

Emmanuel Odioko
May 28, 2024 ⋅ 6 min read
Understanding Cross Platform Graphics In Rust With Wgpu

Leverage Rust and wgpu for effective cross-platform graphics

Use Rust with wgpu to work directly with the new WebGPU standard for better control, cross-platform performance, and bug handling.

Mario Zupan
May 28, 2024 ⋅ 36 min read
View all posts

One Reply to "How to write more readable React code"

  1. Not sure I agree with a for loop over reduce.

    First I don’t think the list for things you have to keep in mind is correct. Why are you thinking about the previous value? If you’re doing that then you’re thinking about things being combined in a linear fashion which isn’t great. You should be thinking with pure functions when using functional methods.

    Also with the order – you already have the lengths and the limits. It’s the length of the array. It’s baked in. You get that for free. So the only thing with order is declaring the initial state. That’s also easy, just declare the variable first like you would with a for loop and pass it in if that’s the issue. But there is also a bonus with reduce – it takes a function. That means you can move that function out and just use a name. `ids.reduce(addItemToObject, {})`.

    The issue with a for loop is it can do anything. With reduce you are already hinting at what you want to do (i.e. reduce an array). The other factor that comes in is that with reduce you are expected to use a pure function (if you’re not then that’s a whole other issue). That takes a lot of context out of the equation, whereas a for loop can be using context from anywhere. So the only thing that is weird about it is the order.

Leave a Reply