2023-03-07
3361
#react
Kasra Khosravi
32679
Mar 7, 2023 ⋅ 12 min read

Web components vs. React

Kasra Khosravi Founder at FeedbackOnSite.co.

Recent posts:

the replay oct 15 graphic

The Replay (10/15/25): AI’s accessibility problem, React 19.2, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 15th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 15, 2025 ⋅ 34 sec read
AI has an accessibility problem: What devs can do about it

AI has an accessibility problem: What devs can do about it

Jemima Abu examines where AI falls short on accessibility and how we can best harness AI while still building products that everyone can use.

Jemima Abu
Oct 15, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read

Want to run your AI model locally? Here’s what you should know

Cloud AI made scaling easy, but local AI brings control, cost stability, and data privacy. Explore the hardware realities, tradeoffs, and strategies shaping this shift.

Clara Ekekenta
Oct 15, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

Stop writing REST APIs from scratch in 2025

Writing REST APIs by hand is a thing of the past. Frameworks like tRPC, Fastify, and Hono eliminate boilerplate with schema-driven design, improving speed and safety.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Oct 14, 2025 ⋅ 3 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Web components vs. React"

  1. You forgot to say we can pass easily data to react components while it is hard to do for webComponents. Only primitive arguments are supported and it is a pain to pass functions, objects or class instances.

  2. -Types of (React) components include functional and class. That’s not two types, but two ways of doing the same.
    -Types of (web) components include custom elements, shadow DOM, and templates. Shadow DOM it’s a property of custom elements and templates are not part of web components at all.
    -Components are reusable in React only. As long as they may be compiled as web components itself, how it’s this possible? I’m even using React components in Angular (without WC build).
    -The ecosystem is not as vast as React’s ecosystem. How can a Web standard not have a good ecosystem?
    -(React) It is a JavaScript library for building UI interfaces for single-page applications. That’s what it was intended to be, but people build entire SPAs with it, not just UI.
    -It is a set of different technologies that allow us to create reusable and isolated elements. It’s not a set of technologies, as it’s a Web standard and JavaScript is the only technology used. (Of course there are options that allow you to use more comfortable alternatives, like stencil, lit-element…)

  3. You can package the entire react componen as a JS lib and reuse in any App. Good ir bad idea… But you can do It.

  4. You are wrong here I am afraid. Web components have a JS interface which allows properties and any other complex argument to be passed.

    Many wc helper libraries like lit-element also provide convenience mechanisms to do this in just the same way you would in react.

Leave a Reply