2020-04-15
2706
#graphql
Leonardo Losoviz
17085
Apr 15, 2020 ⋅ 9 min read

Versioning fields in GraphQL

Leonardo Losoviz Freelance developer and writer, with an ongoing quest to integrate innovative paradigms into existing PHP frameworks, and unify all of them into a single mental model.

Recent posts:

i tried kiro and here is what i learned

I tried out Kiro: Here’s what I learned

Check out Kiro, AWS’s AI-powered IDE, see what makes it different from other AI coding tools, and explore whether it lives up to the hype.

Elijah Asaolu
Aug 28, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
Go Design Pattern Article Image With Logo

Why Go design patterns still matter

Here’s how three design patterns solved our Go microservices scaling problems without sacrificing simplicity.

Peter Aideloje
Aug 28, 2025 ⋅ 2 min read
how to protect your ai agent from prompt injection attacks

How to protect your AI agent from prompt injection attacks

Explore six principled design patterns (with real-world examples) to help you protect your LLM agents from prompt injection attacks.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 27, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
Don’t Let AI Erase The Next Generation Of Dev Leaders

Don’t let AI erase the next generation of dev leaders

As AI tools take over more routine coding work, some companies are cutting early-career dev roles — a short-sighted move that could quietly erode the next generation of tech leaders if we aren’t careful.

Jack Herrington
Aug 26, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Versioning fields in GraphQL"

  1. Unfortunately, this solution will not work when changing field type or removing mandatory constraint. Any suggestions on that front?

  2. If we want to rename/remove a field. I think @deprecated is enough and simple. I think this solution might be more suitable for add/remove required from a field. If we make versionConstraint mandatory, won’t the query statement becomes verbose?
    I think using version will not avoid the “field cemetery” issue. Using deprecated we have 1 field cemetery. Using version we might have several field cemetery with different versions which is better than deprecated. Because we can have a gray strategy to retired those fields. What if we have a date or release date in deprecationReason like “deprecationReason: at 9/10 release”? so that we can know which one is older.
    The idea of using extension to tell the engineer of warning and deprecated fields is really great! Though I don’t agree with all the opinions of this post, this is still an awesome post!!

Leave a Reply