2020-04-09
2168
#graphql
Leonardo Losoviz
16731
Apr 9, 2020 â‹… 7 min read

Speeding up changes to the GraphQL schema

Leonardo Losoviz Freelance developer and writer, with an ongoing quest to integrate innovative paradigms into existing PHP frameworks, and unify all of them into a single mental model.

Recent posts:

Fix over-caching with dynamic IO caching in Next.js 15

Next.js 15 caching overhaul: Fix overcaching with Dynamic IO and the use cache directive.

David Omotayo
Aug 6, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
LLMs are facing a QA crisis here’s how we could solve it

LLMs are facing a QA crisis: Here’s how we could solve it

LLM QA isn’t just a tooling gap — it’s a fundamental shift in how we think about software reliability.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 4, 2025 â‹… 7 min read

Windsurf vs. Cursor: When to choose the challenger

Windsurf AI brings agentic coding and terminal control right into your IDE. We compare it to Cursor, explore its features, and build a real frontend project.

Chizaram Ken
Jul 31, 2025 â‹… 9 min read

The CSS if() function: Conditional styling will never be the same

The CSS Working Group has approved the if() function for development, a feature that promises to bring true conditional styling directly to our stylesheets.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jul 30, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Speeding up changes to the GraphQL schema"

  1. regarding discountedPrice example. I think create 2 different Product types instead of create 2 branches in discountedPrice in the same type is more clear to me. Because these 2 types of Products should belongs to 2 different Bounded Context(https://martinfowler.com/bliki/BoundedContext.html). As time goes on, the 2 branches will grow. It won’t look as simple as it was created at the beginning. And there will be more fields like discountedPrice in the Product type. The logic will be more verbose and might need to be decoupled. So I don’t think using the same discountedPrice to handle the requirements of tutorial team and workshop team is a good idea. Though this is a great post!

  2. Actually, i prefer multiple graphql layers to handle the issues in this post. there will be 2 graphql layers in companywide . the first layer just combine different data sources including: DB, RESTFul, etc. but don’t do any modification. the 2nd layer built on the 1st layer which is a BFF(https://www.infoq.com/presentations/graphql-bff/) layer which only service those front-ends.

Leave a Reply