2020-04-09
2168
#graphql
Leonardo Losoviz
16731
Apr 9, 2020 ⋅ 7 min read

Speeding up changes to the GraphQL schema

Leonardo Losoviz Freelance developer and writer, with an ongoing quest to integrate innovative paradigms into existing PHP frameworks, and unify all of them into a single mental model.

Recent posts:

You're doing vibe coding wrong: Here's how to do it right. A LogRocket article

You’re doing vibe coding wrong: Here’s how to do it right

Vibe coding isn’t just AI-assisted chaos. Here’s how to avoid insecure, unreadable code and turn your “vibes” into real developer productivity.

Chizaram Ken
Oct 28, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read

Exploring spec-driven development with the new GitHub Spec Kit

GitHub SpecKit brings structure to AI-assisted coding with a spec-driven workflow. Learn how to build a consistent, React-based project guided by clear specs and plans.

Emmanuel John
Oct 28, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

The different ways to use CSS :has(), with examples

The CSS :has() pseudo-class is a powerful new feature that lets you style parents, siblings, and more – writing cleaner, more dynamic CSS with less JavaScript.

Daniel Schwarz
Oct 24, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

Kombai AI: The AI agent built for frontend development

Kombai AI converts Figma designs into clean, responsive frontend code. It helps developers build production-ready UIs faster while keeping design accuracy and code quality intact.

Jude Miracle
Oct 23, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Speeding up changes to the GraphQL schema"

  1. regarding discountedPrice example. I think create 2 different Product types instead of create 2 branches in discountedPrice in the same type is more clear to me. Because these 2 types of Products should belongs to 2 different Bounded Context(https://martinfowler.com/bliki/BoundedContext.html). As time goes on, the 2 branches will grow. It won’t look as simple as it was created at the beginning. And there will be more fields like discountedPrice in the Product type. The logic will be more verbose and might need to be decoupled. So I don’t think using the same discountedPrice to handle the requirements of tutorial team and workshop team is a good idea. Though this is a great post!

  2. Actually, i prefer multiple graphql layers to handle the issues in this post. there will be 2 graphql layers in companywide . the first layer just combine different data sources including: DB, RESTFul, etc. but don’t do any modification. the 2nd layer built on the 1st layer which is a BFF(https://www.infoq.com/presentations/graphql-bff/) layer which only service those front-ends.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now