2020-08-28
2807
#rust
Andre Bogus
23972
Aug 28, 2020 ⋅ 10 min read

Rust serialization: What’s ready for production today?

Andre Bogus Andre "llogiq" Bogus is a Rust contributor and Clippy maintainer. A musician-turned-programmer, he has worked in many fields, from voice acting and teaching, to programming and managing software projects. He enjoys learning new things and telling others about them.

Recent posts:

Typescript or Zod for Validation?

TypeScript vs Zod: Clearing up validation confusion

Learn when to use TypeScript, Zod, or both for data validation. Avoid redundant checks and build safer, type-sound applications.

Alexander Godwin
Oct 6, 2025 ⋅ 3 min read
Wasm 3 Before GTA 6 LogRocket Article

We got Wasm 3.0 before GTA 6: Meet the web’s new engine

Discover how WebAssembly 3.0’s garbage collector, exception handling, and Memory64 transform Wasm into a true mainstream web platform.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Oct 3, 2025 ⋅ 2 min read

How to use AI to build accurate ShadCN components

AI agents often break shadcn/ui components with outdated docs or made-up props. The MCP server fixes this by giving live access to registries. In this tutorial, we’ll set it up and build a Kanban board to show it in action.

Chizaram Ken
Oct 3, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
Rust Project for Web Services LogRocket Article

The best way to structure Rust web services

Learn how to structure Rust web services with clean architecture, Cargo workspaces, and modular crates for scalable, maintainable backends.

Jude Miracle
Oct 2, 2025 ⋅ 2 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Rust serialization: What’s ready for production today?"

  1. Hi Ander,

    Thanks for the interesting article.
    I try to understand the background of the serialization/deserialization methods on the Serde. For example, how the BinCode serialization method encodes data and which metadata store after encoding.

    Best,
    Saeed

  2. This is great. I really appreciate this concise overview which is exactly what I needed to start shopping. One thing though that would help immensely is if, at least in the comparison table, the units were all standard or if there was an option to make them standard or to sort them. For today, I will calculate them in a spreadsheet (happy to share, obviously) but I’m sure the next person who wants to use this the same way will appreciate the lack of an extra step.

    Thanks for all the great work!

    1. Thanks for the nice words. The units *are* all standard SI units. But I think you may actually mean they should be the same unit (e.g. nanoseconds). The downside is that this would yield some pretty big numbers which aren’t that easy to parse either. I’ll try and see if a nanosecond-based comparison is any easier to read.

  3. MessagePack is a self describing protocol and therefore has to encode the field names (‘variant’,’opt_bool’,’vec_strs’,’range’). I really can’t see how this would fit into 24 bytes total, only the field names would take 28 bytes (so without any protocol overhead and values) if I’m counting correctly…

Leave a Reply