2022-05-26
2788
#redux
Joseph Mawa
113587
May 26, 2022 ⋅ 9 min read

Redux Toolkit’s new listener middleware vs. Redux-Saga

Joseph Mawa A very passionate open source contributor and technical writer

Recent posts:

Implementing local-first agentic AI: A practical guide

A practical walkthrough of building local-first, privacy-preserving AI agents using small language models.

Rosario De Chiara
Jan 29, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
A Guide To Async/Await In TypeScript

A guide to async/await in TypeScript

TypeScript’s async/await lets you write asynchronous code that reads like synchronous code, making it easier to understand, maintain, and reason about.

Olasunkanmi John Ajiboye
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 17 min read
the replay jan 28

The Replay (1/28/26): Anti-frameworkism, dev superpowers, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 28th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 33 sec read

Building AI apps that remember: Mem0 vs Supermemory

Compare mem0 and Supermemory to learn how modern AI apps manage long-term memory beyond RAG and stateless LLM chats.

Kapeel Kokane
Jan 26, 2026 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Redux Toolkit’s new listener middleware vs. Redux-Saga"

  1. Hiya, I’m a Redux maintainer and the person who drove development of the listener middleware. Very nice post!

    A few quick thoughts:

    I actually covered our current recommendations for which Redux middleware to use when in my recent Reactathon talk “The Evolution of Redux Async Logic”: https://blog.isquaredsoftware.com/2022/05/presentations-evolution-redux-async-logic/ .

    As a TL;DW: use RTK Query for data fetching; thunks for logic that just needs to talk to the store; and listeners if your code needs to react to actions or state changes. Only reach for sagas as a last resort if no other tool works.

    Per the bundle sizes table – this is a bit confusing and misleading, because it’s comparing two specific APIs vs the entire RTK library. In addition, that “12.7K min+gz for all of RTK” _also_ includes the size of Immer, Reselect, and the Redux core.

    Also, RTK _does_ tree-shake. If I just use `configureStore` and `createSlice`, you won’t pay the cost of including `createAsyncThunk`, `createEntityAdapter`, or `createListenerMiddleware`. So, yes, the _entire_ lib is 12.7K min+gz including dependencies, but most apps aren’t using every single API in RTK.

    I’m actually very curious where you got the “6.6K min” size for the listener middleware. With how Bundlephobia works, and because we ship our package as a single file per module build artifact, that isn’t broken out separately. When the middleware was still a standalone package for alpha testing, it looked like the “modern” bundle file for that build was coming in right at 4K min

    I just did some hand-inspection of the `cjs.production.min` and `esm.modern.min` build artifacts in our published package, and pulled out _just_ the listener middleware code. Looks like the “ESM modern” code is only 3.8K min, and the “CJS compat” code is 5.1K min. Running each of those through GZIP, I get 1.7K min+gz for “modern”, and 2K min+gz for “CJS compat”. So, the table isn’t too far off, but actual code included in the bundle _should_ be a bit better than what’s listed 🙂

    I appreciate you taking the time to write this article, and put together the comparisons. Glad to hear that you’ve found the listener middleware “easy to learn”!

  2. Hi @Acemarke, Joseph here. Thanks for reading and taking time to provide feedback. I do agree Bundlephobia’s estimates are far from precise. I will update the article and highlight it in the corresponding section. And include the other points you raised. I believe readers will find them useful as well.

    Thanks once again for your time.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now