2019-07-31
787
#chrome#web design#what's new
Facundo Corradini
4338
Jul 31, 2019 ⋅ 2 min read

New in Chrome 76: The frosted glass effect with backdrop-filter

Facundo Corradini Frontend developer, CSS specialist, best cebador de mates ever.

Recent posts:

How to solve coordination problems in Islands architecture

How to solve coordination problems in Islands architecture

Solve coordination problems in Islands architecture using event-driven patterns instead of localStorage polling.

Muhammed Ali
Feb 26, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
lewis angular signal forms

Signal Forms: Angular’s best quality of life update in years

Signal Forms in Angular 21 replace FormGroup pain and ControlValueAccessor complexity with a cleaner, reactive model built on signals.

Lewis Cianci
Feb 25, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read
replay 2 25 26

The Replay (2/25/26): Signal Forms, Ralph to the rescue, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 25th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 25, 2026 ⋅ 32 sec read

Google & Shopify’s UCP: How AI agents sell online

Explore how the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) allows AI agents to connect with merchants, handle checkout sessions, and securely process payments in real-world e-commerce flows.

Emmanuel John
Feb 24, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "New in Chrome 76: The frosted glass effect with backdrop-filter"

  1. Instead of writing

    @supports (backdrop-filter: none) {

    backdrop-filter: blur(8px);

    }

    one should be writing

    @supports (backdrop-filter: blur(8px)) {

    backdrop-filter: blur(8px);

    }

    because you’re not in fact interested if the browser supports “backdrop-filter: none”, right?

    This is especially important once you realize that the same property (e.g. display) supports values with wide range of support by different UAs.

  2. Hi Mikko,

    The idea is to query the support of the property instead of the value. Querying for “backdrop-filter: none” will throw the same true / false result as querying for “backdrop-filter: 8px”, but allow us to change the value in a single place if for whatever reason we decide to do that in the future.

    It might not be such a dramatic impact in the small scale, but going with a query for property+value can lead to issues as the codebase grows and we start to have a lot of repetition and forgotten queries that doesn’t really make sense.

    Your point is certainly valid for properties such as display or position, but for most others, querying for property instead of property+value is a better approach in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now