2019-07-31
787
#chrome#web design#what's new
Facundo Corradini
4338
Jul 31, 2019 ⋅ 2 min read

New in Chrome 76: The frosted glass effect with backdrop-filter

Facundo Corradini Frontend developer, CSS specialist, best cebador de mates ever.

Recent posts:

How to fix React routing loopholes with the React Router Middleware

How to fix React routing loopholes with the React Router Middleware

Learn how React Router’s Middleware API fixes leaky redirects and redundant data fetching in protected routes.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 3 min read
How I used Mastra to build a prize-winning RAG agent

How I used Mastra to build a prize-winning RAG agent

A developer’s retrospective on creating an AI video transcription agent with Mastra, an open-source TypeScript framework for building AI agents.

Chinwike Maduabuchi
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read

Ensuring frontend data integrity with TanStack DB transactions

Learn how TanStack DB transactions ensure data consistency on the frontend with atomic updates, rollbacks, and optimistic UI in a simple order manager app.

Emmanuel John
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
the replay november 12

The Replay (11/12/25): Stop making these useEffect mistakes

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 5th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 12, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read
View all posts

2 Replies to "New in Chrome 76: The frosted glass effect with backdrop-filter"

  1. Instead of writing

    @supports (backdrop-filter: none) {

    backdrop-filter: blur(8px);

    }

    one should be writing

    @supports (backdrop-filter: blur(8px)) {

    backdrop-filter: blur(8px);

    }

    because you’re not in fact interested if the browser supports “backdrop-filter: none”, right?

    This is especially important once you realize that the same property (e.g. display) supports values with wide range of support by different UAs.

  2. Hi Mikko,

    The idea is to query the support of the property instead of the value. Querying for “backdrop-filter: none” will throw the same true / false result as querying for “backdrop-filter: 8px”, but allow us to change the value in a single place if for whatever reason we decide to do that in the future.

    It might not be such a dramatic impact in the small scale, but going with a query for property+value can lead to issues as the codebase grows and we start to have a lot of repetition and forgotten queries that doesn’t really make sense.

    Your point is certainly valid for properties such as display or position, but for most others, querying for property instead of property+value is a better approach in my opinion.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now