2024-07-23
2415
#typescript
Paul Cowan
2066
Jul 23, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read

A complete guide to const assertions in TypeScript

Paul Cowan Contract software developer.

Recent posts:

Understanding Promise.all in JavaScript

Is Promise.all still relevant in 2025?

In 2025, async JavaScript looks very different. With tools like Promise.any, Promise.allSettled, and Array.fromAsync, many developers wonder if Promise.all is still worth it. The short answer is yes — but only if you know when and why to use it.

Leonardo Maldonado
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
the replay october 29

The Replay (10/29/25): Tiny AI agents, Next.js 16, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 29th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 34 sec read
next js 16 is here

Next.js 16: What’s new, and what it means for frontend devs

Learn about the new features in the Next.js 16 release: why they matter, how they impact your workflow, and how to start using them.

Abiola Farounbi
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
is Llama really as bad as people say? I put Meta’s AI to the test

Is Llama really as bad as people say? I put Meta’s AI to the test

Test out Meta’s AI model, Llama, on a real CRUD frontend projects, compare it with competing models, and walk through the setup process.

Chizaram Ken
Oct 29, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "A complete guide to <code>const</code> assertions in TypeScript"

  1. The example in your conclusion is wrong: z and a would not be read-only since those are the keys for nested object. This is currently the behavior of “as const” syntax.

  2. that isn’t true, this is the resultant type:

    “`
    let obj: {
    readonly x: 10;
    readonly y: readonly [20, 30];
    readonly z: {
    readonly a: {
    readonly b: 42;
    };
    };
    }
    “`
    and this error happens when you try to modify z o a
    “`
    Cannot assign to ‘z’ because it is a read-only property.(2540)
    “`

  3. The example with redux actions is striking. With interfaces it’s clear and reads nicely, with ‘const’ assertion, it becomes more…implicit and easier to overlook. IMO interfaces are better for this purpose. The goal is not to write maintainable code, not as little code as possible.
    But the purpose of the assertion is clear when it comes to literals.
    Nice article, thanks!

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now