2023-03-09
1696
#typescript
Paul Cowan
2066
Mar 9, 2023 ⋅ 6 min read

A complete guide to const assertions in TypeScript

Paul Cowan Contract software developer.

Recent posts:

Leveraging Wasp For Full-Stack Development

Leveraging Wasp for full-stack development

Learn how the Wasp, Web Application Specification, framework simplifies full-stack development by offloading repetitive code tasks.

Wisdom Ekpotu
May 27, 2024 ⋅ 11 min read
Developing Web Extensions With Wxt

Developing web extensions with the WXT library

Browser extensions are an important part of the web ecosystem. They make our lives easier and enhance our web browsing […]

Debjyoti Banerjee
May 24, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
Bulma Css Adoption Guide: Overview, Examples, And Alternatives

Bulma CSS adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives

Explore how Bulma CSS simplifies frontend development with its ease of use and customizable, responsive, pre-designed UI elements.

Timonwa Akintokun
May 23, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Using Mountaineer To Develop A React App With Python

Using Mountaineer to develop a React app with Python

Develop a React app with Python using the Mountaineer framework for building a simple app with integrated your frontend and backend database.

Rosario De Chiara
May 23, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "A complete guide to <code>const</code> assertions in TypeScript"

  1. The example in your conclusion is wrong: z and a would not be read-only since those are the keys for nested object. This is currently the behavior of “as const” syntax.

  2. that isn’t true, this is the resultant type:

    “`
    let obj: {
    readonly x: 10;
    readonly y: readonly [20, 30];
    readonly z: {
    readonly a: {
    readonly b: 42;
    };
    };
    }
    “`
    and this error happens when you try to modify z o a
    “`
    Cannot assign to ‘z’ because it is a read-only property.(2540)
    “`

  3. The example with redux actions is striking. With interfaces it’s clear and reads nicely, with ‘const’ assertion, it becomes more…implicit and easier to overlook. IMO interfaces are better for this purpose. The goal is not to write maintainable code, not as little code as possible.
    But the purpose of the assertion is clear when it comes to literals.
    Nice article, thanks!

Leave a Reply