2024-07-16
3166
#typescript
Abhinav Anshul
137956
Jul 16, 2024 ⋅ 11 min read

Schema validation in TypeScript with Zod

Abhinav Anshul Doing interesting things on the Web.

Recent posts:

LLM routing in production: Choosing the right model for every request

Learn how LLM routing works in production, when it’s worth the complexity, and how teams choose the right model for each request.

Alexander Godwin
Feb 5, 2026 ⋅ 11 min read
React Svelte Next JS

Remix vs. Next.js vs. SvelteKit

Compare key features of popular meta-frameworks Remix, Next.js, and SvelteKit, from project setup to styling.

Alex Merced
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
replay feb 4

The Replay (2/4/26): AI-first leadership, Tailwind layoffs, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 4th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 37 sec read
ken pickering ai first organization

What it actually means to be an AI-first engineering organization

AI-first isn’t about tools; it’s about how teams think, build, and decide. Ken Pickering, CTO at Scripta Insights, shares how engineering leaders can adapt.

Ken Pickering
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 3 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Schema validation in TypeScript with Zod"

  1. Correct me if I am wrong, but you don’t use the parse function with TS typically… you infer the type, effectively from the ZOD ‘model’ (I call it) and then you assign that type to the variable, or function return or whatever as you would usually do with TS. Then parse is done inherently as part of type checking, but standardized with ZOD models.

    Got a huge app, sharing front and backend code, express/vite. Express has routes hierarchical frontend doesn’t, plus has it’s own router. Trying to share route strings mostly and response types. Also trying to figure out naming conventions… ATM I am using SomethingModel for the ZOD stuff and SomethingModelType for the type inferers but its a bit verbose.

  2. I’m searching for good examples of how to name the zod schema objects.
    Unfortunately your examples disappointed me.

    When you ask a programmer what ‘dataInputFromUser’ means they would think it’s a variable that holds the actual data entered by the user at runtime.
    To express the intended meaning ‘dataInputFromUserSchema’ would be more to the point.

    Identifier with upper camel case names (like ‘UserData’) usually denote either a class, interface, enum, global constant or a type. So it’s clear that these variables don’t hold the values itself, but rather describe the allowed/expected value. Hence such a name is not that missleading.
    But typically you also want to have a TS type with the same name (‘UserData’). Unfortunately this w/could lead to a name clash. So ‘UserDataSchema’ seems to be the solution here.

  3. Great Article! One possible error in the article to correct. Under the section Adding a custom validation with Zod:
    .refine((data) => data.mobileNumber === data.confirmMobileNumber
    This should probably be !== in order to trigger the message?

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now