2024-07-16
3166
#typescript
Abhinav Anshul
137956
Jul 16, 2024 ⋅ 11 min read

Schema validation in TypeScript with Zod

Abhinav Anshul Doing interesting things on the Web.

Recent posts:

Offline-first frontend apps in 2025: IndexedDB and SQLite in the browser and beyond

The web has always had an uneasy relationship with connectivity. Most applications are designed as if the network will be […]

Alexander Godwin
Nov 18, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
Real-Time AI In Next.js How To Stream Responses With The Vercel AI SDK

Real-time AI in Next.js: How to stream responses with the Vercel AI SDK

Streaming AI responses is one of the easiest ways to improve UX. Here’s how to implement it in a Next.js app using the Vercel AI SDK—typing effect, reasoning, and all.

Elijah Asaolu
Nov 17, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
How to fix React routing loopholes with the React Router Middleware

How to fix React routing loopholes with the React Router Middleware

Learn how React Router’s Middleware API fixes leaky redirects and redundant data fetching in protected routes.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 3 min read
How I used Mastra to build a prize-winning RAG agent

How I used Mastra to build a prize-winning RAG agent

A developer’s retrospective on creating an AI video transcription agent with Mastra, an open-source TypeScript framework for building AI agents.

Chinwike Maduabuchi
Nov 13, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Schema validation in TypeScript with Zod"

  1. Correct me if I am wrong, but you don’t use the parse function with TS typically… you infer the type, effectively from the ZOD ‘model’ (I call it) and then you assign that type to the variable, or function return or whatever as you would usually do with TS. Then parse is done inherently as part of type checking, but standardized with ZOD models.

    Got a huge app, sharing front and backend code, express/vite. Express has routes hierarchical frontend doesn’t, plus has it’s own router. Trying to share route strings mostly and response types. Also trying to figure out naming conventions… ATM I am using SomethingModel for the ZOD stuff and SomethingModelType for the type inferers but its a bit verbose.

  2. I’m searching for good examples of how to name the zod schema objects.
    Unfortunately your examples disappointed me.

    When you ask a programmer what ‘dataInputFromUser’ means they would think it’s a variable that holds the actual data entered by the user at runtime.
    To express the intended meaning ‘dataInputFromUserSchema’ would be more to the point.

    Identifier with upper camel case names (like ‘UserData’) usually denote either a class, interface, enum, global constant or a type. So it’s clear that these variables don’t hold the values itself, but rather describe the allowed/expected value. Hence such a name is not that missleading.
    But typically you also want to have a TS type with the same name (‘UserData’). Unfortunately this w/could lead to a name clash. So ‘UserDataSchema’ seems to be the solution here.

  3. Great Article! One possible error in the article to correct. Under the section Adding a custom validation with Zod:
    .refine((data) => data.mobileNumber === data.confirmMobileNumber
    This should probably be !== in order to trigger the message?

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now