When delivering a new feature or function for your product, there’s always a tension between releasing a complete initiative and the need to deliver incremental value on a regular basis for customers. Opinions may diverge on this point, but there tends to be more value in building a feature out using the iterative process, instead of delivering a full product release later on.
As a product manager, you need to routinely add value to the user experience. This involves receiving continuous feedback that helps you and your team decide on the next steps. Such a decision requires knowing whether users are satisfied or if you need to continue development.
In this article, you will learn what the interview process is, the benefits it provides, and the steps you need to take to implement it within your product development.
The iterative process involves building out a new feature or function for the product one step at a time. This helps an organization maximize product, design, and engineering resources in order to provide value to the user on a semi-regular basis.
Teams use iterative product development for two interconnected reasons. First, by iteratively releasing or shipping increments of a new feature or function for users, you can provide an immediate benefit to users without them having to wait for the launch of the entire feature.
Second, providing incremental value or parts of a new feature to users initially can help product managers obtain feedback on the direction of the feature while it’s still under construction. This allows you to make a decision as to whether to continue on or wrap up development.
Iterative product development helps you by:
Pursuing iterative product development allows the small, beneficial parts of the new feature to be in users hands on a regular basis. For example, imagine if your team was part of a social media app and you’re introducing a new feature that allows users to add multiple friends to their follower list at a time.
A good first step might be adding the ability to add one friend at a time to their follower list. This way, the user receives an immediate feature, but you can also test the foundations of the new feature.
The ability to break a feature up into iterations assists a product manager in obtaining feedback from users at each stage. By putting the pieces together little by little, you include the user in the development process and can adapt to feedback that you receive. This helps you understand user needs and remain agile.
Building features and functions iteratively helps organizations maximize the quality of each iteration and prevents delays that could arise out of product misalignment.
By undertaking iterative development, technical and practical risks are minimized and each iteration’s potential is maximized until the next iteration can be undertaken.
Use the following steps to implement the iterative process into your product development process:
The first step towards iterative product development requires collaborating with the product designer to develop what the end goal looks like. Inputs from multiple customer feedback channels, customer interviews to online surveys, and data analytics reports, should be used to shape the final feature.
Initially, the final solution should not take into account time, scope, or resource constraints. It should represent the end state when all the ideal conditions align themselves for the team.
Once you design the final feature, the team should then have a number of different brainstorming sessions together. The main purpose of these sessions is to review the final solution and come up with a product feature prioritization strategy:
After brainstorming and deciding on the necessary parts, it’s time to start breaking the product down into iterations. You want to ensure that each iteration has enough work to cover a regular sprint cycle.
Each iteration also needs to have enough value in and of itself to be shipped out to users. Ask yourself, “What is the main benefit that will be realized by shipping this increment of the new feature?” Link the iterations to parts of the problem you want to solve for your users.
Finally, iterations should be time scoped and you need to set expectations for what kind of release it is. Although all iterations will eventually be realized as customer benefits down the line, there may be times when the function or feature will be released to a sub-set of customers or all customers generally, depending on what you are trying to get out of it.
Broadly, there are three different types of releases that should be considered when it comes to iterations:
Applying the iterative process to product management allows you to continuously provide users with new benefits, receive increased feedback, and maximize your resources. The process helps to prevent you from learning about product issues at the end of development when it’s already too late, or too expensive to rectify them.
If you follow the points above, you’ll be able to implement an iterative product development approach in no time!
Featured image source: IconScou
LogRocket identifies friction points in the user experience so you can make informed decisions about product and design changes that must happen to hit your goals.
With LogRocket, you can understand the scope of the issues affecting your product and prioritize the changes that need to be made. LogRocket simplifies workflows by allowing Engineering, Product, UX, and Design teams to work from the same data as you, eliminating any confusion about what needs to be done.
Get your teams on the same page — try LogRocket today.
Trey Courtney talks about his process for evaluating partnerships or acquisitions and how he successfully implements these initiatives.
Asma Syeda shares the importance of responsible AI and best practices for companies to ensure their AI technology remains ethical.
What hard skills do PMs need in 2025? Learn how AI tools can help you level up in SQL, Figma, A/B testing, and more.
Paul Weston talks about “quantifying the unquantifiable,” i.e., bringing in objective data for things that otherwise seem hard to measure.
Learn more →
