2022-02-01
2640
#typescript
Sneh Pandya
90351
Feb 1, 2022 â‹… 9 min read

Methods for TypeScript runtime type checking

Sneh Pandya Exploring the horizon with a knack for product management. Co-host of the NinjaTalks podcast and community organizer at Google Developers Group. Explorer, adventurer, traveler.

Recent posts:

how to use the ternary operator in javascript

How to use the ternary operator in JavaScript

Add to your JavaScript knowledge of shortcuts by mastering the ternary operator, so you can write cleaner code that your fellow developers will love.

Chizaram Ken
Feb 21, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
Using tsup To Bundle Your TypeScript Package

Using tsup to bundle your TypeScript package

Learn how to efficiently bundle your TypeScript package with tsup. This guide covers setup, custom output extensions, and best practices for optimized, production-ready builds.

Muhammad Ali
Feb 20, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
how to use react higher order components

How to use React higher-order components

Learn the fundamentals of React’s high-order components and play with some code samples to help you understand how it works.

Hussain Arif
Feb 20, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
dependency inversion principle

Understanding the dependency inversion principle (DIP)

Learn about the dependency inversion principle (DIP), its importance, and how to implement it across multiple programming languages.

Samuel Olusola
Feb 20, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Methods for TypeScript runtime type checking"

  1. One big downside to io-ts and similar libraries, is all your types are inferred.

    This has some major drawbacks compared with literal types: there is nowhere for you to write documentation – or at least nothing that will be visible to IDE auto completion or a documentation generator. Also, error messages may be very difficult to understand – they aren’t going to point to a specific member, but instead to a complex stack of derived types. And lastly, no automated (remame) refactorings or “find usages” will be available, so you miss out on a lot of the productivity aspects of TS.

    I had high hopes for this approach, but I eventually ended up writing both validators and proper types anyhow, meaning a lot of duplication. Just something to consider before selecting this approach.

Leave a Reply