Sneh Pandya
Feb 1, 2022 ⋅ 9 min read

Methods for TypeScript runtime type checking

Sneh Pandya Exploring the horizon with a knack for product management. Co-host of the NinjaTalks podcast and community organizer at Google Developers Group. Explorer, adventurer, traveler.

Recent posts:

Using Rust And Leptos To Build Beautiful Declarative User Interfaces

Using Rust and Leptos to build beautiful, declarative UIs

Leptos is an amazing Rust web frontend framework that makes it easier to build scalable, performant apps with beautiful, declarative UIs.

Eze Sunday
Nov 30, 2023 ⋅ 10 min read
5 Best JavaScript Multi-Dimensional Array Libraries

5 best JavaScript multidimensional array libraries

Learn more about the 5 best JavaScript libraries for dealing with multidimensional arrays, such as ndarray, math.js, and NumJs.

Pascal Akunne
Nov 30, 2023 ⋅ 4 min read
Dom Scandinaro Leader Spotlight

Leader Spotlight: Leading by experience with Dom Scandinaro

We spoke with Dom about his approach to balancing innovation with handling tech debt and to learn how he stays current with technology.

Jessica Srinivas
Nov 30, 2023 ⋅ 6 min read
Vite Adoption Guide Overview Examples And Alternatives

Vite adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives

Vite is a versatile, fast, lightweight build tool with an exceptional DX. Let’s explore when and why you should adopt Vite in your projects.

David Omotayo
Nov 29, 2023 ⋅ 16 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Methods for TypeScript runtime type checking"

  1. One big downside to io-ts and similar libraries, is all your types are inferred.

    This has some major drawbacks compared with literal types: there is nowhere for you to write documentation – or at least nothing that will be visible to IDE auto completion or a documentation generator. Also, error messages may be very difficult to understand – they aren’t going to point to a specific member, but instead to a complex stack of derived types. And lastly, no automated (remame) refactorings or “find usages” will be available, so you miss out on a lot of the productivity aspects of TS.

    I had high hopes for this approach, but I eventually ended up writing both validators and proper types anyhow, meaning a lot of duplication. Just something to consider before selecting this approach.

Leave a Reply