2024-04-16
2219
#nextjs
Doğacan Bilgili
90502
Apr 16, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read

Implementing WebSocket communication in Next.js

Doğacan Bilgili A software developer who is also into 3D-modeling and animation.

Recent posts:

lewis angular signal forms

Signal Forms: Angular’s best quality of life update in years

Signal Forms in Angular 21 replace FormGroup pain and ControlValueAccessor complexity with a cleaner, reactive model built on signals.

Lewis Cianci
Feb 25, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read
replay 2 25 26

The Replay (2/25/26): Signal Forms, Ralph to the rescue, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 25th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 25, 2026 ⋅ 32 sec read

Google & Shopify’s UCP: How AI agents sell online

Explore how the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) allows AI agents to connect with merchants, handle checkout sessions, and securely process payments in real-world e-commerce flows.

Emmanuel John
Feb 24, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
6 React Server Component performance pitfalls in Next.js

6 React Server Component performance pitfalls in Next.js

React Server Components and the Next.js App Router enable streaming and smaller client bundles, but only when used correctly. This article explores six common mistakes that block streaming, bloat hydration, and create stale UI in production.

Temitope Oyedele
Feb 23, 2026 ⋅ 13 min read
View all posts

23 Replies to "Implementing WebSocket communication in Next.js"

  1. Great article! Works great on localhost. I seem to be stuck at deployment though. I assume that since serverless solutions such as Vercel cannot run this then either can netlify or amplify etc? Right? What would be a good hosting solution for a nextjs app that uses socket.io like how you have outlined here?

      1. I had a website on vercel. I was trying to do that. As you said it works locally but it was not working on prod. :/ It seems heroku is different but I do not want to move my project there. I wish Vercel provide us the same thing :/

        1. That’s because Vercel runs serverless functions; they’re not meant to run 24/7 nor are they a single instance (they scale up and down). You need a custom server if you want to do WebSockets, and Vercel doesn’t support hosting custom servers.

          Next.js is good for handling requests and sending responses, if you want to do WebSockets, use a 3rd party service like Pusher or host your own solution beside Next.js.

    1. Thanks for your comment. Since Socket.io is built on top of the WebSocket protocol, we don’t feel the title is inaccurate or misleading.

      1. It is misleading because when searching for information about the ‘ws’ package (aka WebSocket) one gets this article, which talks about Socket.IO. The API offered by the 2 packages are different so this article is misleading.

  2. apparently it doesn’t like the wrapping of the socketInitializer function. I get the following:

    Warning: useEffect must not return anything besides a function, which is used for clean-up.

    It looks like you wrote useEffect(async () => …) or returned a Promise. Instead, write the async function inside your effect and call it immediately:

    useEffect(() => {
    async function fetchData() {
    // You can await here
    const response = await MyAPI.getData(someId);
    // …
    }
    fetchData();
    }, [someId]); // Or [] if effect doesn’t need props or state

    also, the Google and Twitter login mechanisms on this site are broken

  3. this is not working in my localhost, first i’ve write the codes that not worked, then i’ve copy all codes and paste , that not works too….

  4. Thank you for the article

    I’m struggling to see *why* this is working though (even though I can see that it does).

    According to Next-JS, the res object is a `http.ServerResponse` object. This does indeed contain a `socket` which is a `net.Socket object` (https://nodejs.org/api/net.html#class-netsocket).

    The documentation never mentions a `server` property on `net.Socket` though. where is that coming from? Why isn’t it documented in Node, how did you figure out it exists, why is Typescript also denying it exists? etc. etc.

    I’m happy it works, but it feels weird to use something that (as far as I can see) is an undocumented hidden feature 🙂

  5. Could you explain the lifecycle of the API route? From my understanding each client will have a separate response object, thus a separate SocketIO instance? For how long will it stay active?

    Seems to me if I wish to do client-client communication I will need a customer server.

    “`
    const SocketHandler = (req, res) => {
    if (res.socket.server.io) {
    console.log(‘Socket is already running’)
    } else {
    console.log(‘Socket is initializing’)
    const io = new Server(res.socket.server)
    res.socket.server.io = io
    }
    res.end()
    }
    “`

    1. You are correct. I left a comment above where I explain that yes, you need a custom server to handle this. Also, WebSockets won’t let you set up P2P/client-client communication, you can look into WebRTC for that.

  6. This isn’t working, I keep getting a 404 localhost:3000/socket.io?EIO=4&transport=polling&t=OWzE3BU 404 (N

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now