2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

Comparing Hattip Vs Express Js For Modern Application Development

Comparing Hattip vs. Express.js for modern app development

Explore what Hattip is, how it works, its benefits and key features, and the differences between Hattip and Express.js.

Antonello Zanini
May 2, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
Using React Shepherd To Build A Site Tour

Using React Shepherd to build a site tour

React Shepherd stands out as a site tour library due to its elegant UI and out-of-the-box, easy-to-use React Context implementation.

Onuorah Bonaventure
May 1, 2024 ⋅ 14 min read
A Guide To Cookies In Next Js

A guide to cookies in Next.js

Cookies are crucial to web development. This article will explore how to handle cookies in your Next.js applications.

Georgey V B
Apr 30, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Handling Dates In JavaScript With Tempo

Handling dates in JavaScript with Tempo

Use the Tempo library to format dates and times in JavaScript while accounting for time zones, daylight saying time, and date internationalization.

Amazing Enyichi Agu
Apr 30, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply