2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

Developing Web Extensions With Wxt

Developing web extensions with the WXT library

Browser extensions are an important part of the web ecosystem. They make our lives easier and enhance our web browsing […]

Debjyoti Banerjee
May 24, 2024 ⋅ 8 min read
Bulma Css Adoption Guide: Overview, Examples, And Alternatives

Bulma CSS adoption guide: Overview, examples, and alternatives

Explore how Bulma CSS simplifies frontend development with its ease of use and customizable, responsive, pre-designed UI elements.

Timonwa Akintokun
May 23, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Using Mountaineer To Develop A React App With Python

Using Mountaineer to develop a React app with Python

Develop a React app with Python using the Mountaineer framework for building a simple app with integrated your frontend and backend database.

Rosario De Chiara
May 23, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read
Enhance CSS View Transitions With Velevette

Enhance CSS view transitions with Velvette

Velvette is a utility library developed to make working with view transitions easier.

David Omotayo
May 22, 2024 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply