2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs text-wrap: pretty

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs. text-wrap: pretty

Compare and contrast two CSS components, text-wrap: balance and text-wrap: pretty, and discuss their benefits for better UX.

Daniel Schwarz
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Remix 3 ditched React: Should you stick with it?

Remix 3 ditches React for a Preact fork and a “Web-First” model. Here’s what it means for React developers — and why it’s controversial.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read

Autogen vs. Crew AI: Choosing the right agentic framework

A quick guide to agentic AI. Compare Autogen and Crew AI to build autonomous, tool-using multi-agent systems.

Kapeel Kokane
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Nov 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of November 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Nov 6, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now