2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

tailwind typography

How to use the Tailwind Typography plugin

Walk you through how to set up and use the Tailwind Typography plugin, also known as the @tailwindcss/typography or the prose plugin.

David Omotayo
May 7, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
Running TypeScript In Node.js: Tsx Vs. Ts-node Vs. Native

Running TypeScript in Node.js: tsx vs. ts-node vs. native

TypeScript adds static typing to JavaScript code, which helps reduce unpredictable behavior and bugs. In the past, TypeScript code couldn’t […]

Amazing Enyichi Agu
May 7, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
Authentication And Authorization In Astro

Authentication and authorization in Astro

Implement secure authentication and role-based authorization in Astro using JWT, SSR, and Astro middleware for protected routes.

Emmanuel John
May 6, 2025 ⋅ 23 min read
How To Use Custom Fonts In Tailwind CSS

How to use custom fonts in Tailwind CSS

Walk through how to use Google Fonts and locally installed fonts in your Tailwind projects to help you improve your project typography and design consistency.

Peter Ekene Eze
May 6, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply