2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

Exploring The Top Rust Web Frameworks

Exploring the top Rust web frameworks

In this article, we’ll explore the best Rust frameworks for web development, including Actix Web, Rocket, Axum, warp, Leptos, Cot, and Loco.

Abiodun Solomon
May 28, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
How To Use The CSS Cursor Property

How to use the CSS cursor property

A single line of CSS can change how users feel about your UI. Learn how to leverage the cursor property to signal intent, improve interaction flow, and elevate accessibility.

Chizaram Ken
May 28, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
Build TypeScript App Vite

How to build a React + TypeScript app with Vite

We explore the benefits of building an app with React, TypeScript, and Vite, and compare its performance to the same app built with CRA.

Clara Ekekenta
May 28, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read

How to use Claude to build a web app

Learn how to build a weather app using Claude, from setting up infrastructure to creating a functional UI that displays city-based forecasts.

Andrew Evans
May 28, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply