2019-05-31
912
#react
Abishek Jakhar
2158
May 31, 2019 ⋅ 3 min read

Returning null from setState in React 16

Abishek Jakhar Designer, Developer & Gamer

Recent posts:

Apple Liquid Glass LogRocket

How to create Liquid Glass effects with CSS and SVG

This tutorial walks through recreating Apple’s Liquid Glass UI on the web using SVG filters, CSS, and React. You’ll learn how to build refraction and reflection effects with custom displacement and specular maps, and how to balance performance and accessibility when using advanced filter pipelines.

Rahul Chhodde
Dec 8, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
tRPC vs ORPC: Which is better for your next TypeScript project, and why?

tRPC vs oRPC: Which is better for your next TypeScript project, and why?

tRPC solved type safety for full-stack TypeScript teams. oRPC borrowed the best parts and added interoperability. This article breaks down how both frameworks work and where each one fits best.

Temitope Oyedele
Dec 8, 2025 ⋅ 22 min read
gemini 3 and antigravity

A developer’s guide to Antigravity and Gemini 3

Check out Google’s latest AI releases, Gemini and the Antigravity AI IDE. Understand what’s new, how they work, and how they can reshape your development workflow.

Elijah Asaolu
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
bun 1.3 javascript runtime what's new

Bun 1.3: Is it time for devs to rethink the Node stack?

Learn about Bun 1.3, which marks a shift from fast runtime to full JS toolchain—and see the impact of Anthropic’s acquisition of Bun.

Alex Merced
Dec 4, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Returning null from setState in React 16"

  1. Point of clarification for someone relatively new to React: am I correct to say that it is not necessary to return null with setstate in the way described in this article when the [unchanging] state value(s) are members of a mapped list (where each member in the list has been assigned a unique key)? Or restated, is it the case that a mapped list, where each element in the list is assigned a unique key, only updates those elements where a state change has occurred, and so the technique explained by this article would not be necessary for unchanging elements of a mapped list even when other elements in the list undergo state changes?

    Great article, by the way. Everything makes sense. My question is mostly to make sure I have everything straight when it comes to state updates.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now