2019-05-31
912
#react
Abishek Jakhar
2158
May 31, 2019 ⋅ 3 min read

Returning null from setState in React 16

Abishek Jakhar Designer, Developer & Gamer

Recent posts:

the replay november 12

The Replay (11/12/25): Stop making these useEffect mistakes

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 5th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 12, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read
15 most common useEffect mistakes

15 common useEffect mistakes to avoid in your React apps

Shruti Kapoor breaks down the confusion around useEffect and goes over 15 common mistakes she’s seen in the React apps she’s reviewed.

Shruti Kapoor
Nov 12, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
Giving Jarvis Hands: What Mcp Means For Ai Integrations On The Open Web LogRocket Article

The next phase of dev: Building for MCP and the open web

MCP is the bridge between AI and the open web — giving intelligent agents the ability to act, not just talk. Here’s how this open protocol transforms development, business models, and the future of software itself.

Peter Aideloje
Nov 11, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

You’ve authenticated your user, but have you authorized your agent?

AI agents can now log in, act, and access data, but have you truly authorized them? This guide walks through how to secure your autonomous agents using Auth0’s Auth for GenAI, covering token vaults, human-in-the-loop approvals, and fine-grained access control.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 10, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Returning null from setState in React 16"

  1. Point of clarification for someone relatively new to React: am I correct to say that it is not necessary to return null with setstate in the way described in this article when the [unchanging] state value(s) are members of a mapped list (where each member in the list has been assigned a unique key)? Or restated, is it the case that a mapped list, where each element in the list is assigned a unique key, only updates those elements where a state change has occurred, and so the technique explained by this article would not be necessary for unchanging elements of a mapped list even when other elements in the list undergo state changes?

    Great article, by the way. Everything makes sense. My question is mostly to make sure I have everything straight when it comes to state updates.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now