
Valdi skips the JavaScript runtime by compiling TypeScript to native views. Learn how it compares to React Native’s new architecture and when the trade-off makes sense.

What trends will define web development in 2026? Check out the eight most important trends of the year, from AI-first development to TypeScript’s takeover.

AI-first debugging augments traditional debugging with log clustering, pattern recognition, and faster root cause analysis. Learn where AI helps, where it fails, and how to use it safely in production.

Container queries let components respond to their own layout context instead of the viewport. This article explores how they work and where they fit alongside media queries.
Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
2 Replies to "Using RxJS Observables to transform data in TypeScript"
Svelte is a much better system for Observables. It requires setting up its dev tools. As it compiles observable code according to how it is being used.
With rxjs, never ever use subscribe or unsubscribe yourself. Leave it to a framework such as Angular. Don’t put yourself in a place that a memory leak could happen. Even if it never does. Knockout.js deprecation is a good example why.
Yes, this is something I agree with.
Managing subscriptions ourselves can be risky because we might forget to unsubscribe from the Observable, resulting in a memory leak.
Svelte manages our subscriptions on our behalf. This, in my opinion, makes it one of the most reactive frameworks.
Considering Node.js where there are no native Observables, we are left to manage subscriptions ourselves.