2021-10-15
1630
#vanilla javascript
Ibadehin Mojeed
72024
Oct 15, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Using JavaScript’s .at() method

Ibadehin Mojeed I'm an advocate of project-based learning. I also write technical content around web development.

Recent posts:

Glowing 3D cube with the MediaPipe and React logos overlaid, symbolizing integration of AI and web development

How to build better AI apps in React with MediaPipe’s latest APIs

Learn how to integrate MediaPipe’s Tasks API into a React app for fast, in-browser object detection using your webcam.

Emmanuel John
Jul 17, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
Vercel AI SDK logo on a 3D black grid background

How to build unified AI interfaces using the Vercel AI SDK

Integrating AI into modern frontend apps can be messy. This tutorial shows how the Vercel AI SDK simplifies it all, with streaming, multimodal input, and generative UI.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jul 16, 2025 ⋅ 13 min read
how to prepare for a software engineering interview

How to prep for a software dev interview: Advice from a dev leader

Interviewing for a software engineering role? Hear from a senior dev leader on what he looks for in candidates, and how to prepare yourself.

Andrew Evans
Jul 16, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
Next.js Real-Time Video Streaming: HLS.js And Alternatives

Next.js real-time video streaming: HLS.js and alternatives

Set up real-time video streaming in Next.js using HLS.js and alternatives, exploring integration, adaptive streaming, and token-based authentication.

Jude Miracle
Jul 15, 2025 ⋅ 19 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Using JavaScript’s <code>.at()</code> method"

  1. .at() is really useful but would be better to just add support into index operator. I know that there is possibility of having “-1” key/index, but what could have been done is if the key exist then return the value of the key else return value from length minus the supplied negative value. There is very rare possibility that “-1” is used as a key by anyone till date.

    1. I hope you understand its just not “-1” and can be “-2”, “-3”, …., “-100000000”,… you got me I think!

  2. I think your random number example has an issue. Math.random() returns between 0 and 1 inclusive which could put the index beyond the length of the array and result in an undefined.

    1. Hi James, thanks for reading. Be aware that Math.random() returns value between 0 (inclusive) and 1 (exclusive). Meaning it never returns 1. So by multiplying that with the array length of 3, we will never get a value of 3. So the output is 0, 1 and 2. And that will never result in an undefined. Thank you.

  3. Brilliant article thank you. I particularly liked your examples, and I had no idea you could store a value at the index -1!

    What’s really interesting is that if you set an array with a value at -1 such:

    “`
    let arr = [0, 1, 2];
    arr[-1] = -1
    “`

    And then use at:

    “`
    arr.at(-1) // returns 2
    “`

    It returns 2 rather than the value you set.

    Also, the fact that you can use decimal values with `at` is a gamechanger!

Leave a Reply