2023-06-19
1703
#typescript
Debjyoti Banerjee
171799
104
Jun 19, 2023 ⋅ 6 min read

Understanding TypeScript generators

Debjyoti Banerjee I'm Debjyoti, software engineer and game developer. Currently exploring JavaScript and Flutter, and trying to come up with solutions to problems in the healthcare sector. Love open source.

Recent posts:

feb 11 the replay

The Replay (2/11/26): React performance wins, fine-grained frameworks, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 11th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 11, 2026 ⋅ 34 sec read
react optimization shruti kapoor

A complete guide to React performance optimization

Cut React LCP from 28s to ~1s with a four-phase framework covering bundle analysis, React optimizations, SSR, and asset/image tuning.

Shruti Kapoor
Feb 11, 2026 ⋅ 9 min read
fine grained everything rich harris

Fine Grained Everything, and what comes after React Server Components

Rich Harris (creator of Svelte) joined PodRocket this week to unpack his Performance Now talk, Fine Grained Everything.

Elizabeth Becz
Feb 10, 2026 ⋅ 55 sec read
Cloudflare Stack Decisions LogRocket Article

Fortifying your stack with Cloudflare: A security playbook

Cloudflare strengthens security at the edge, but real protection depends on how you design, layer, and own controls beyond it.

Peter Aideloje
Feb 10, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "Understanding TypeScript generators"

  1. An obscure feature of a language that has much bigger issues to deal with first. This is probably the fifth article I read about it, but I’ve never seen anyone actually use it in the wild, including me.

    1. I agree. And it’s gimmicky.
      As an article, it’s good; but as a dev pattern I could imagine one of my junior, programmers burning up hours—or even days or weeks—looking for clever ways to use this feature (a “clever” solution looking for the ideal problem) …only to have the next maintainer come along and rip it out for something more straightforward.

  2. I think this next() call:

    console.log(generator.next()); // Uncaught Error: Something went wrong

    Is not correct. That error doesn’t get thrown out of the generator because it is caught within the generator.

  3. Generators are a JavaScript language feature, not a Typescript feature. How can we take the author seriously if he doesn’t even know the most fundamental fact about the topic he’s discussing

    1. I think you need to chill out. It IS technically a feature in typescript too, as TS supports whatever JS supports, but really, does an author have to state the obvious for it to be taken seriously? Maybe people learn TS and not JS, or, maybe people don’t care.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now