2023-06-19
1703
#typescript
Debjyoti Banerjee
171799
104
Jun 19, 2023 ⋅ 6 min read

Understanding TypeScript generators

Debjyoti Banerjee I'm Debjyoti, software engineer and game developer. Currently exploring JavaScript and Flutter, and trying to come up with solutions to problems in the healthcare sector. Love open source.

Recent posts:

the replay january 7

The Replay (1/7/26): React’s biggest problem, TanStack’s evolution, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 7th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 7, 2026 ⋅ 31 sec read
jack herrington useeffectevent

React has finally solved its biggest problem: The joys of useEffectEvent

Jack Herrington breaks down how React’s new useEffectEvent Hook stabilizes behavior, simplifies timers, and enables predictable abstractions.

Jack Herrington
Jan 7, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read

Don’t ship another chat UI. Build real AI with AG-UI

AG-UI is an event-driven protocol for building real AI apps. Learn how to use it with streaming, tool calls, and reusable agent logic.

Emmanuel John
Jan 6, 2026 ⋅ 14 min read

Anti-frameworkism: Choosing native web APIs over frameworks

Frontend frameworks are often chosen by default, not necessity. This article examines when native web APIs deliver better outcomes for users and long-term maintenance.

Anna Monus
Jan 5, 2026 ⋅ 7 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "Understanding TypeScript generators"

  1. An obscure feature of a language that has much bigger issues to deal with first. This is probably the fifth article I read about it, but I’ve never seen anyone actually use it in the wild, including me.

    1. I agree. And it’s gimmicky.
      As an article, it’s good; but as a dev pattern I could imagine one of my junior, programmers burning up hours—or even days or weeks—looking for clever ways to use this feature (a “clever” solution looking for the ideal problem) …only to have the next maintainer come along and rip it out for something more straightforward.

  2. I think this next() call:

    console.log(generator.next()); // Uncaught Error: Something went wrong

    Is not correct. That error doesn’t get thrown out of the generator because it is caught within the generator.

  3. Generators are a JavaScript language feature, not a Typescript feature. How can we take the author seriously if he doesn’t even know the most fundamental fact about the topic he’s discussing

    1. I think you need to chill out. It IS technically a feature in typescript too, as TS supports whatever JS supports, but really, does an author have to state the obvious for it to be taken seriously? Maybe people learn TS and not JS, or, maybe people don’t care.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now