2024-10-21
1777
#typescript
Simohamed Marhraoui
70024
Oct 21, 2024 ⋅ 6 min read

Understanding infer in TypeScript

Simohamed Marhraoui Vue and React developer | Linux enthusiast | Interested in FOSS

Recent posts:

the replay january 21 2026

The Replay (1/21/26): Booming CSS, Tauri 2.0, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 21st issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 21, 2026 ⋅ 39 sec read
jemima abu css in 2026 replacing javascript

CSS in 2026: The new features reshaping frontend development

Jemima Abu, a senior product engineer and award-winning developer educator, shows how she replaced 150+ lines of JavaScript with just a few new CSS features.

Jemima Abu
Jan 21, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read

Why AI coding tools shift the real bottleneck to review

AI writes code fast. Reviewing it is slower. This article explains why AI changes code review and where the real bottleneck appears.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jan 20, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
Your security team blocked Cursor and Claude Code— time to switch to OpenCode

Your security team blocked Cursor and Claude Code—time to switch to OpenCode

When security policies block cloud AI tools entirely, OpenCode with local models offers a compliant alternative.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jan 19, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "Understanding <code>infer</code> in TypeScript"

  1. A literal [ ‘hello’ , ‘world’ ] in Typescript code is by default typed as a mutable array not a readonly tuple, but you can resolve this with `as const`.

    Although it was a two-arg string array when you created it, Typescript models it as a mutable array, because you could push(), pop() and so on. One way to defeat this type-widening, alex should be declared `as const` which prevents it from being considered mutable and makes push(), pop() a compiler error so it can never vary from being a two-value tuple.

    I really liked the learning associated with infer, (for when you can’t edit the function), but for the case where you can edit the function, I think a better fix is for the person type to be asserted readonly in the first place and to use `as const` when composing person objects, which allows the original code to compile…

    function describePerson(person: Readonly<{
    name: string;
    age: number;
    hobbies: Readonly; // tuple
    }>) {
    return `${person.name} is ${person.age} years old and love ${person.hobbies.join(” and “)}.`;
    }

    const alex = {
    name: ‘Alex’,
    age: 20,
    hobbies: [‘walking’, ‘cooking’] // type is [string, string]
    } as const;

    describePerson(alex)

    Getting this right means that you haven’t type-widened the alex object, to turn e.g. hobbies into [string,string] by declaring it as a Person. When you use `as const` the hobbies property can still be inferred by the editor as being the narrower [‘walking’,’cooking’]. This has saved me a million times where compiler and editor awareness of the values is needed to guard sensitive logic. For example, some other type might be {hobby:’cooking’|’walking’, favouriteOutdoorMeals:string[]} and the compiler can know that both values of alex.hobbies fulfil the hobby value. This is not possible after type-widening them to string.

    See also https://learntypescript.dev/10/l4-readonly-function-parameters and https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/master/packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/prefer-readonly-parameter-types.md

    You can see the above approach in the playground https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/GYVwdgxgLglg9mABAEwKYGcICcYCNUAKqW6CAFAA7GlgBciASqgIbIIA2AngDwDeAsAChEiMMwC2qeuig4wAcwDcQkc3lTRIcfizLhiABZxcuGBnpNWHHgG0Zc+QBpE9mAoC6APkWIA9L8QoEAp2VCEAX08ASkQBfSxUIKwkAAMAEl4qEgQAOjFJcMQYdEQMrJoctVRCzhYSRDh2ZERmMGb2OAA3VFLM6lyjEzN0HIArODcyACIWtpEpqPCclL1woSEIBBkW0IAPRABeWJVRCQ0AcgBBPfPHE6r6ACYABjv9QdNzRBtzgHdmdgAazc8luiHOmzgwIU53cfgCUE4VCKJTsshBzlcHgiLRKmzAMj0QjQmBw+CI2TAZABqF2USAA

  2. Thank you so much for this great article. I didn’t get a sense of “infer” from official TS guide. But here it described perfectly

  3. This is so COOL! This article let me understand the concept of ‘infer’. Thanks a lot, Marhraoui 🙂

  4. For you who need to infer Function return Promise,

    type PromiseReturnType = T extends Promise ? Return : T
    type FunctionReturnType = T extends (…args: any[]) => infer R
    ? PromiseReturnType
    : any

  5. “`
    function getFirst(arr: T): T extends [infer U, …unknown[]] ? U : never {
    return arr[0];
    }

    const firstNumber = getFirst([1, 2, 3]); // firstNumber is inferred as number
    const firstString = getFirst([‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’]); // firstString is inferred as string
    “`
    This example is not working in TS Playground. Both variables get `never`.

    1. Hey Serg! Thanks for letting us know. We contacted the writer, and he updated the code snippet and its explanation.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now