Eslam Hefnawy
Jun 1, 2020 ⋅ 5 min read

Testing state changes in React functional components

Eslam Hefnawy Serverless Architect at Serverless, Inc. Co-creator of the Serverless Framework and the lead architect of Serverless Components.

Recent posts:

How To Integrate WunderGraph With Your Frontend Application

How to integrate WunderGraph with your frontend application

Unify and simplify APIs using WunderGraph to integrate REST, GraphQL, and databases in a single endpoint.

Boemo Mmopelwa
May 17, 2024 ⋅ 5 min read
Understanding The Latest Webkit Features In Safari 17.4

Understanding the latest Webkit features in Safari 17.4

The Safari 17.4 update brought in many modern features and bug fixes. Explore the major development-specific updates you should be aware of.

Rahul Chhodde
May 16, 2024 ⋅ 10 min read
Using Webrtc To Implement Peer To Peer Video Streaming In A Node Js Project

Using WebRTC to implement P2P video streaming

Explore one of WebRTC’s major use cases in this step-by-step tutorial: live peer-to-peer audio and video streaming between systems.

Oduah Chigozie
May 16, 2024 ⋅ 18 min read
Htmx Vs React

htmx vs. React: Choosing the right library for your project

Both htmx and React provide powerful tools for building web apps, but in different ways that are suited to different types of projects.

Temitope Oyedele
May 15, 2024 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Testing state changes in React functional components"

  1. with this approach we need to interact with the component’s DOM and simulate the events which I feel like E2E test. I feel uncomfortable to see ‘find’ in unit tests. What do you say?

  2. Hello, I think the approach used for “should update state on click” is not correct. jest.fn() returns a function. So changeSize is a function. So changeSize will always be truthy even if you did not simulate the click. try to expect(changeSize).toBeCalled(). You will see that the function is not called at all.

  3. Big “No” on that last test. If you comment out the simulate(“click”) line in the testcase, the test still passes. Therefore this is not a valid test. As Omar said, jest.fn() returns a function. I’m surprised you didn’t update this article after his comment, which is clearly correct. I don’t recommend using a unit test to test internal state. Instead test external effects.

  4. That’s a good catch! Sorry for the confusion folks! I updated the article, notified the editors and it should be published soon.

Leave a Reply