2023-03-07
3361
#react
Kasra Khosravi
32679
Mar 7, 2023 â‹… 12 min read

Web components vs. React

Kasra Khosravi Founder at FeedbackOnSite.co.

Recent posts:

SOLID Series: Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)

A deep dive into the Liskov Substitution Principle with examples, violations, and practical tips for writing scalable, bug-free object-oriented code.

Oyinkansola Awosan
Jun 6, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
Modern CSS Carousels: No JavaScript Required

Modern CSS carousels: No JavaScript required

This article walks through new CSS features like ::scroll-button() and ::scroll-marker() that make it possible to build fully functional CSS-only carousels.

Saleh Mubashar
Jun 6, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
hidden coast of developer elitism

It’s time to break the cycle of developer elitism

Let’s talk about one of the greatest problems in software development: nascent developers bouncing off grouchy superiors into the arms of AI.

Lewis Cianci
Jun 4, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
When To Use Flexbox And When To Use CSS Grid

When to use Flexbox and when to use CSS Grid

Flexbox and Grid are the heart of modern CSS layouts. Learn when to use each and how they help build flexible, responsive web designs — no more hacks or guesswork.

Leonardo Maldonado
Jun 3, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Web components vs. React"

  1. You forgot to say we can pass easily data to react components while it is hard to do for webComponents. Only primitive arguments are supported and it is a pain to pass functions, objects or class instances.

  2. -Types of (React) components include functional and class. That’s not two types, but two ways of doing the same.
    -Types of (web) components include custom elements, shadow DOM, and templates. Shadow DOM it’s a property of custom elements and templates are not part of web components at all.
    -Components are reusable in React only. As long as they may be compiled as web components itself, how it’s this possible? I’m even using React components in Angular (without WC build).
    -The ecosystem is not as vast as React’s ecosystem. How can a Web standard not have a good ecosystem?
    -(React) It is a JavaScript library for building UI interfaces for single-page applications. That’s what it was intended to be, but people build entire SPAs with it, not just UI.
    -It is a set of different technologies that allow us to create reusable and isolated elements. It’s not a set of technologies, as it’s a Web standard and JavaScript is the only technology used. (Of course there are options that allow you to use more comfortable alternatives, like stencil, lit-element…)

  3. You can package the entire react componen as a JS lib and reuse in any App. Good ir bad idea… But you can do It.

  4. You are wrong here I am afraid. Web components have a JS interface which allows properties and any other complex argument to be passed.

    Many wc helper libraries like lit-element also provide convenience mechanisms to do this in just the same way you would in react.

Leave a Reply