2019-10-15
859
#typescript#what's new
Paul Cowan
8357
Oct 15, 2019 ⋅ 3 min read

New in TypeScript 3.7

Paul Cowan Contract software developer.

Recent posts:

designing llm first products

Designing LLM-first products, not just features

Everyone’s building chat-first AI products. And most of them suck. Here’s how to break the mold and ship LLM-native software that actually solves problems.

Rosario De Chiara
May 30, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read
Build A React AI Image Generator With Hugging Face Diffusers

Build a React AI image generator with Hugging Face Diffusers

Build a React-based AI image generator app offline using the Hugging Face Diffusers library and Stable Diffusion XL.

Andrew Baisden
May 29, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
Gemini 2.5 and the future of AI reasoning for frontend devs

Gemini 2.5 and the future of AI reasoning for frontend devs

Get up to speed on Google’s latest breakthrough with the Gemini 2.5 model and what it means for the future of frontend AI tools.

Chizaram Ken
May 29, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
Exploring The Top Rust Web Frameworks

Exploring the top Rust web frameworks

In this article, we’ll explore the best Rust frameworks for web development, including Actix Web, Rocket, Axum, warp, Leptos, Cot, and Loco.

Abiodun Solomon
May 28, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "New in TypeScript 3.7"

  1. So typescript is going to have pretty much every feature C# has. (what a coincidence, they’re designed by the same person)

  2. The optional chaining operator just tells me that I am going to show up at client sites where every single dot in the application is preceded by a question mark, the same way that async permeates through the code.

    It tells me that nobody is actually going to know anything about the data that runs through the system, and it’s going to hide bugs that are ridiculous to solve, because they could have happened at any `?.` upstream from where your data was supposed to be.
    Moreover, this affects all downstream systems, as well.

    I’m not saying that 10,000 null checks is good, either. What I am saying is that we are programming backwards. What I am saying is that we should have systems that are hermetically sealed, and operate only on types that are known, not types where every member is optional/nullable. If you can’t build an instance of a type with the pieces you have been given (plus any reasonable defaults), then you should take a different path in code, rather than passing in a tree that is garnished with nulls.

    The invention/inclusion of null in programming languages was Tony Hoare’s billion dollar mistake, and instead of thinking about how we can program without it, we are making it easier to make everything null, at all times, without crashing.

    However, the null coalescing operator is a good tool for building those known and trusted data types from untrusted data sources (server responses, database fields, localStorage, user input), *if* the field you are settling has a valid default/empty/identity state. Optional chaining would be fine to use in the case where you were grabbing an expected value from an unknown data source, and using the coalescing operator to set the default, when building a closed system of well-defined types… but we all know that isn’t how it’s going to be used.

  3. Personally I think the worst thing about their announcement blog post is the dubious formatting of ternary operators. I mean, everybody knows that you’re supposed to format them
    “`
    var result = condition
    ? first_expression()
    : second_expression()
    “`

Leave a Reply