#typescript#what's new
Paul Cowan
Oct 15, 2019 ⋅ 3 min read

New in TypeScript 3.7

Paul Cowan Contract software developer.

Recent posts:

Superglue Vs. Hotwire For Modern Frontend Development

Superglue vs. Hotwire for modern frontend development

Explore how Superglue and Hotwire revolutionize frontend development with HTML over the wire, enhancing performance, flexibility, and ease of use.

Frank Joseph
Jun 12, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read
Using Pocketbase To Build A Full Stack Application

Using PocketBase to build a full-stack application

PocketBase is a performant Go-based tool that comes with essential features like user auth, file uploads, access control rules, and more.

Rahul Padalkar
Jun 11, 2024 ⋅ 18 min read
The Top Tools For Implementing E-Commerce Search In React

The top tools for implementing e-commerce search in React

Explore top frontend tools for implementing e-commerce search functionality with React demo implementations.

Saleh Mubashar
Jun 10, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read
Signals Vs Ngonchanges For Better Angular State Management

Signals vs. ngOnChanges for better Angular state management

Angular is evolving in some exciting ways. Explore how signals enhance state management compared to the “old” approach using ngOnChanges.

Lewis Cianci
Jun 7, 2024 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "New in TypeScript 3.7"

  1. So typescript is going to have pretty much every feature C# has. (what a coincidence, they’re designed by the same person)

  2. The optional chaining operator just tells me that I am going to show up at client sites where every single dot in the application is preceded by a question mark, the same way that async permeates through the code.

    It tells me that nobody is actually going to know anything about the data that runs through the system, and it’s going to hide bugs that are ridiculous to solve, because they could have happened at any `?.` upstream from where your data was supposed to be.
    Moreover, this affects all downstream systems, as well.

    I’m not saying that 10,000 null checks is good, either. What I am saying is that we are programming backwards. What I am saying is that we should have systems that are hermetically sealed, and operate only on types that are known, not types where every member is optional/nullable. If you can’t build an instance of a type with the pieces you have been given (plus any reasonable defaults), then you should take a different path in code, rather than passing in a tree that is garnished with nulls.

    The invention/inclusion of null in programming languages was Tony Hoare’s billion dollar mistake, and instead of thinking about how we can program without it, we are making it easier to make everything null, at all times, without crashing.

    However, the null coalescing operator is a good tool for building those known and trusted data types from untrusted data sources (server responses, database fields, localStorage, user input), *if* the field you are settling has a valid default/empty/identity state. Optional chaining would be fine to use in the case where you were grabbing an expected value from an unknown data source, and using the coalescing operator to set the default, when building a closed system of well-defined types… but we all know that isn’t how it’s going to be used.

  3. Personally I think the worst thing about their announcement blog post is the dubious formatting of ternary operators. I mean, everybody knows that you’re supposed to format them
    var result = condition
    ? first_expression()
    : second_expression()

Leave a Reply