2023-12-27
2027
#css
Sarah Chima Atuonwu
69819
Dec 27, 2023 â‹… 7 min read

Native CSS nesting: What you need to know

Sarah Chima Atuonwu I am a Fullstack software developer that is passionate about building products that make lives better. I also love sharing what I know with others in simple and easy-to-understand articles.

Recent posts:

Improving Frontend Workflows With In-Browser Database Tools

​​Improving frontend workflows with in-browser database tools

In-browser database tools like RxDB and Neo4j Sandbox help frontend devs manage data, work offline, and streamline tasks with AI support.

Muhammed Ali
Jun 3, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
How To Iterate Over Enums In TypeScript

How to iterate over enums in TypeScript (with code examples)

Learn exactly how to iterate over numeric and string enums in TypeScript, with practical code snippets and type-safe patterns.

Matteo Di Pirro
Jun 2, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
How To Import SVGs Into Your Next.js Apps

How to import SVGs into your Next.js apps: A 2025 guide

Learn the best 2025 methods to import SVGs in Next.js 14+, with tips on performance, styling, and App Router integration.

Joseph Mawa
Jun 2, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
designing llm first products

Designing LLM-first products, not just features

Everyone’s building chat-first AI products. And most of them suck. Here’s how to break the mold and ship LLM-native software that actually solves problems.

Rosario De Chiara
May 30, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Native CSS nesting: What you need to know"

  1. Maybe not best to use it unless totally necessary, as SCSS still has advantages of not requiring to use that many ampersands in the code. And it can easily be forgotten or that it can catch errors before the compiling has completed. And also that we have modules that we can work from which would make it ideal. But either way would be good to have that as native.

    Kind regards,
    Michael

  2. BBEdit can reformat these before and after examples to be much easier to understand. For instance, here’s the over-nested example:

    main
    {
    & section { background-color: red;
    & ul { background-color: green;
    & .list { font-size: 16px;
    & .link { color: pink;
    &: hover { color: blue;
    }

    main section { background-color: red; }
    main section ul { background-color: green; }
    main section ul .list { font-size: 16px; }
    main section ul .list .link { color: pink; }
    main section ul .list .link:hover { color: blue; }

  3. After writing Less, Sass, SCSS, Stylus, back to SCSS… and now spending a year with no pre-processor: it’s hard to imagine using this syntax. As huge fans of nesting… we can’t believe we’re come to a point where we might just prefer not to. If we could skip the & on every line, and we also had HTTP2 or something concatenate the files natively, maybe it would be a winner. We’ll cross our fingers for something better to happen… or wait to evolve our stance.

  4. Hi Sarah, thanks a lot. About “Styles after nested selectors are ignored”, it works on my side so does it depends of the browser?

Leave a Reply