2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

How to manage JavaScript closures in React

The proper handling of JavaScript closures is essential to any JavaScript project. In React projects specifically, closures can manifest themselves […]

Tanishka Kashikar
Mar 24, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
array filter method javascript

How to use the array filter() method in JavaScript

Learn about the array filter() method, from its basic syntax and use cases to more advanced techniques like chaining with map() and reduce().

Abiola Farounbi
Mar 24, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
css vertical alignment

CSS vertical alignment: Best practices and examples

CSS has come a long way, making vertical alignment easier than ever. Learn about this concept and explore some of the best CSS vertical alignment techniques.

Facundo Corradini
Mar 23, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
How to win clients with a Flutter web demo that feels real

How to win clients with a Flutter web demo that feels real

Use Flutter to build browser-based app demos that help clients visualize the product, speed up buy-in, and close deals faster.

Lewis Cianci
Mar 21, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply