2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

Vite vs. Webpack for react apps in 2025: A senior engineer’s perspective

Vite vs Webpack in 2025: a senior engineer’s take on performance, developer experience, build control, and when each tool makes sense for React apps.

Peter Aideloje
Dec 19, 2025 ⋅ 3 min read
vitest 4 adoption guide

Vitest 4 adoption guide: Overview and migrating from Jest

Learn how Vitest 4 makes migrating from Jest painless, with codemods, faster tests, native ESM, browser testing, and a better DX.

Onuorah Bonaventure
Dec 18, 2025 ⋅ 15 min read
type vs interface typescript

Types vs. interfaces in TypeScript

Learn when to use TypeScript types vs. interfaces, with practical guidance on React props, advanced mapped and template literal types, performance tradeoffs, and common pitfalls.

Yan Sun
Dec 18, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read

I tested 5 AI CLI tools: Here’s how they stack up

A hands-on comparison of five AI coding CLIs, tested by building the same React Todo app.

Emmanuel John
Dec 18, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now