2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

Top 5 AI code review tools in 2025

A quick comparison of five AI code review tools tested on the same codebase to see which ones truly catch bugs and surface real issues.

Emmanuel John
Nov 27, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
css corner shape property

How to create fancy corners using CSS corner-shape

Learn about CSS’s corner-shape property and how to use it, as well as the more advanced side of border-radius and why it’s crucial to using corner-shape effectively.

Daniel Schwarz
Nov 26, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
the replay graphic november 26

The Replay (11/26/25): An AI reality check, Prisma v7, and more

An AI reality check, Prisma v7, and “caveman compression”: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 26th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 26, 2025 ⋅ 35 sec read

Ripple over React? Evaluating the newest JS framework

RippleJS takes a fresh approach to UI development with no re-renders and TypeScript built in. Here’s why it’s gaining attention.

Chizaram Ken
Nov 26, 2025 ⋅ 15 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now