2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

the replay october 8

The Replay (10/8/25): Data enrichment, CSS is back, TypeScript 5.9

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 8th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 8, 2025 ⋅ 30 sec read
Goodbye, messy data: An engineer’s guide to scalable data enrichment

Goodbye, messy data: An engineer’s guide to scalable data enrichment

Walk through building a data enrichment workflow that moves beyond simple lead gen to become a powerful internal tool for enterprises.

Alexandra Spalato
Oct 8, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

DesignCoder and the future of AI-generated UI

From sketches to code in minutes, DesignCoder shows how AI-generated, hierarchy-aware UIs could change the way developers prototype and ship apps.

Rosario De Chiara
Oct 7, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Should you use if() functions in CSS?

It’s 2025, and CSS finally thinks logically. The if() function brings real conditional styling — no hacks, no JS workarounds. Here’s how to use it right.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Oct 7, 2025 ⋅ 16 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply