2024-03-07
3578
#css
Oscar Jite-Orimiono
96807
Mar 7, 2024 ⋅ 12 min read

5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility

Oscar Jite-Orimiono I'm a self-taught frontend web developer. I build websites so everyone finds a home online. The digital space is massive, full of endless possibilities — let's explore it together!

Recent posts:

how to animate svg with css

How to animate SVG with CSS: Tutorial with examples

Animate SVGs with pure CSS: hamburger toggles, spinners, line-draw effects, and new scroll-driven animations, plus tooling tips and fallbacks.

Hope Armstrong
Jan 23, 2026 ⋅ 16 min read
a dev’s guide to Tailwind CSS in 2026

A dev’s guide to Tailwind CSS in 2026

Tailwind CSS is more popular than ever. This guide breaks down v4’s biggest changes, real-world usage, migration paths, and where it fits in the AI future.

Oscar Jite-Orimiono
Jan 23, 2026 ⋅ 12 min read
react animation libraries 2026

Comparing the best React animation libraries for 2026

Evaluate the top React animation libraries for ease of use, developer experience, and bundle size.

Fortune Ikechi
Jan 22, 2026 ⋅ 21 min read

Why your AI agent needs a task queue (and how to build one)

AI agents fan out work across multiple LLM calls and services. Task queues add retries, ordering, and context preservation to keep these workflows reliable.

Muhammed Ali
Jan 22, 2026 ⋅ 7 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "5 cool CSS header styles with cross-browser compatibility"

  1. I work in a simple product industry, and like everyone else, have a website, so we see how every marketer in my field is inspired by IT projects. We are learning CSS, although we remember well that it was quite difficult at the beginning of our journey. LogRocket is a great approach to improving productivity, and we’re trying to embed your ways of creating value for customers. For example, we use software to control the application with a remote approval feature. So, hopefully, we will keep up with CSS.

  2. I guess this is good stuff above.
    Only the first impression of this site in Google results was not so good. Maybe it happened just accidently, but it gives the immedeate impression of contents not being checked carefully:
    500ms are 0.5 seconds, not 0.050 as we read right now on the page top.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now