2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

tanstack db query driven sync

Tanstack DB 0.5 Query-Driven Sync: Loading data will never be the same

Explore TanStack DB’s new feature, Query-Driven Sync, and how you can leverage it to build efficient, scalable React applications.

David Omotayo
Dec 2, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read

Error boundaries are broken – signals can fix them

Error boundaries catch only render-time failures, which isn’t enough for modern async UIs. Signals treat errors as reactive state, giving you consistent handling across your app.

Isaac Okoro
Dec 1, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
How to speed up long lists with TanStack Virtual

How to speed up long lists with TanStack Virtual

Build fast, scalable UIs with TanStack Virtual: virtualize long lists, support dynamic row heights, and implement infinite scrolling with React.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 28, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
why you should ci cd your project from day one

Why you should set up CI/CD from day one for your apps

CI/CD isn’t optional anymore. Discover how automated builds and deployments prevent costly mistakes, speed up releases, and keep your software stable.

Lewis Cianci
Nov 28, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now