2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

the replay january 21 2026

The Replay (1/21/26): Booming CSS, Tauri 2.0, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 21st issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 21, 2026 ⋅ 39 sec read
jemima abu css in 2026 replacing javascript

CSS in 2026: The new features reshaping frontend development

Jemima Abu, a senior product engineer and award-winning developer educator, shows how she replaced 150+ lines of JavaScript with just a few new CSS features.

Jemima Abu
Jan 21, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read

Why AI coding tools shift the real bottleneck to review

AI writes code fast. Reviewing it is slower. This article explains why AI changes code review and where the real bottleneck appears.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jan 20, 2026 ⋅ 6 min read
Your security team blocked Cursor and Claude Code— time to switch to OpenCode

Your security team blocked Cursor and Claude Code—time to switch to OpenCode

When security policies block cloud AI tools entirely, OpenCode with local models offers a compliant alternative.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jan 19, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now