2024-08-29
3726
#nextjs
Peter Ekene Eze
183861
Aug 29, 2024 ⋅ 13 min read

Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

podrocket 2-18

How developer platforms fail (and how yours won’t)

Russ Miles, a software development expert and educator, joins the show to unpack why “developer productivity” platforms so often disappoint.

Elizabeth Becz
Feb 18, 2026 ⋅ 52 sec read
the replay february 18

The Replay (2/18/26): Copilot workarounds, platform pitfalls, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 18th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 18, 2026 ⋅ 36 sec read
andrew evans claude copilot

Can’t use Claude at work? How I recreated “Skills” in GitHub Copilot

Learn how to recreate Claude Skills–style workflows in GitHub Copilot using custom instruction files and smarter context management.

Andrew Evans
Feb 18, 2026 ⋅ 13 min read

How Ralph makes Claude Code actually finish tasks

Claude Code is deceptively capable. Point it at a codebase, describe what you need, and it’ll autonomously navigate files, write […]

Ikeh Akinyemi
Feb 17, 2026 ⋅ 4 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Diving into Server Actions in Next.js 14"

  1. So the main issue was that if we posted a new item into a list, we had to do the POST request and then pull data again with a GET to have the UI updated? And this was expensive because there are 2 requests for 1 action, basically, right?

    What we did was:
    – we had a layer for state management (i.e Redux)
    – a layer for API calls (middleware on client side)

    Upon a request, we updated UI optimistically or pessimistically, depending on what the team wanted.

    So, when someone does a POST request, it calls the middleware API, We await the status code, if it’s 200, we update the UI (redux state) and this way, we achieve consistency between server and client’s UI in 1 request, not 2. Which means only 1 server is needed (some S3 bucket for the react site files) and 1 action needed (like the pessimistically update mentioned above). No need for having a second server running the server-side components, no need to trigger a GETall after a POST to see the updated UI. Nothing. Just a well structured and organized application. And it still adheres to separation of concerns since on the backend I run edge functions for the updates etc. It’s just more things on the client. And I am totally fine with SSG because yes, first load is larger but then everything else is a breeze, not requiring calls to a server. But yeah, I guess anything goes nowadays.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now