2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

i tried kiro and here is what i learned

I tried out Kiro: Here’s what I learned

Check out Kiro, AWS’s AI-powered IDE, see what makes it different from other AI coding tools, and explore whether it lives up to the hype.

Elijah Asaolu
Aug 28, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
Go Design Pattern Article Image With Logo

Why Go design patterns still matter

Here’s how three design patterns solved our Go microservices scaling problems without sacrificing simplicity.

Peter Aideloje
Aug 28, 2025 â‹… 2 min read
how to protect your ai agent from prompt injection attacks

How to protect your AI agent from prompt injection attacks

Explore six principled design patterns (with real-world examples) to help you protect your LLM agents from prompt injection attacks.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 27, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
Don’t Let AI Erase The Next Generation Of Dev Leaders

Don’t let AI erase the next generation of dev leaders

As AI tools take over more routine coding work, some companies are cutting early-career dev roles — a short-sighted move that could quietly erode the next generation of tech leaders if we aren’t careful.

Jack Herrington
Aug 26, 2025 â‹… 6 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply