2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

axios in javascript

Axios in JavaScript: How to make GET, POST, PUT and DELETE requests

Learn how to use Axios in JavaScript for GET, POST, PUT & DELETE requests. Examine setup, error handling, and API best practices.

Faraz Kelhini
Apr 1, 2025 â‹… 19 min read
how AI is shaping the future of 3D web development

How AI is shaping the future of 3D web development

AI for 3D web development is taking the internet by storm. Learn about this trend, the best tools for 3D web experiences, and how it’ll affect the development landscape moving forward.

Elijah Asaolu
Apr 1, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
docker exit code 1

How to troubleshoot exit code 1 in Docker

exit code 1 is one of the most common and frustrating errors for developers working in Docker. Explore what it means and how to fix it.

Ukeje Goodness
Apr 1, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
axios vs fetch 2025 update

Axios vs. Fetch (2025 update): Which should you use for HTTP requests?

Fetch() is native, but Axios is powerful. Which should you use in 2025? We compare features, error handling, and performance to help you decide.

Faraz Kelhini
Apr 1, 2025 â‹… 13 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply