2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

Fix over-caching with dynamic IO caching in Next.js 15

Next.js 15 caching overhaul: Fix overcaching with Dynamic IO and the use cache directive.

David Omotayo
Aug 6, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
LLMs are facing a QA crisis here’s how we could solve it

LLMs are facing a QA crisis: Here’s how we could solve it

LLM QA isn’t just a tooling gap — it’s a fundamental shift in how we think about software reliability.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 4, 2025 â‹… 7 min read

Windsurf vs. Cursor: When to choose the challenger

Windsurf AI brings agentic coding and terminal control right into your IDE. We compare it to Cursor, explore its features, and build a real frontend project.

Chizaram Ken
Jul 31, 2025 â‹… 9 min read

The CSS if() function: Conditional styling will never be the same

The CSS Working Group has approved the if() function for development, a feature that promises to bring true conditional styling directly to our stylesheets.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jul 30, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply