2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

float ui tutorial

Building responsive websites fast: A Float UI tutorial

Discover Float UI, a set of pre-made templates that leverage the power of Tailwind CSS to help developers create professional websites quickly.

Murat YĂĽksel
Apr 21, 2025 â‹… 22 min read
react toastify

React-Toastify (2025 update): Setup, styling & real-world use cases

Learn how to use React-Toastify in 2025, from setup to styling and advanced use cases like API notifications, async toasts, and React-Toastify 11 updates.

Chimezie Innocent
Apr 18, 2025 â‹… 18 min read
5 Best Open Source Tools For Cross-Browser CSS Testing

5 best open source tools for cross-browser CSS testing

Discover open source tools for cross-browser CSS testing like Playwright and BrowserStack to catch rendering errors, inconsistent styling, and more.

Peter Aideloje
Apr 18, 2025 â‹… 11 min read
react suspense data fetching

How to handle data fetching with React Suspense

With the introduction of React Suspense, handling asynchronous operations like data fetching has become more efficient and declarative.

Ovie Okeh
Apr 18, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply