2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

When is low-code the right choice? Here’s how to decide

Not sure if low-code is right for your next project? This guide breaks down when to use it, when to avoid it, and how to make the right call.

Popoola Temitope
Jul 11, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
Comparing AI App Builders — Firebase Studio vs. Lovable vs. Replit. LogRocket Article

Comparing AI app builders — Firebase Studio vs. Lovable vs. Replit

Compare Firebase Studio, Lovable, and Replit for AI-powered app building. Find the best tool for your project needs.

Emmanuel John
Jul 11, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
Gemini CLI tutorial — Will it replace Windsurf and Cursor?

Gemini CLI tutorial — Will it replace Windsurf and Cursor?

Discover how to use Gemini CLI, Google’s new open-source AI agent that brings Gemini directly to your terminal.

Chizaram Ken
Jul 10, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
React & TypeScript: 10 Patterns For Writing Better Code

React & TypeScript: 10 patterns for writing better code

This article explores several proven patterns for writing safer, cleaner, and more readable code in React and TypeScript.

Peter Aideloje
Jul 10, 2025 â‹… 11 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply