2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

Rust Project for Web Services LogRocket Article

The best way to structure Rust web services

Learn how to structure Rust web services with clean architecture, Cargo workspaces, and modular crates for scalable, maintainable backends.

Jude Miracle
Oct 2, 2025 â‹… 2 min read
andrew evans headshot

A spec-first workflow for building with agentic AI

Andrew Evans gives his take on agentic AI and walks through a step-by-step method to build a spec-first workflow using Claude Code.

Andrew Evans
Oct 1, 2025 â‹… 18 min read

How to use TanStack DB to build reactive, offline-ready React apps

This tutorial shows how to use TanStack DB to build a task manager with live queries, optimistic updates, and offline support, delivering a fast, resilient UX with less boilerplate than traditional React state management.

Emmanuel John
Oct 1, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
how to build a full-stack application with Tanstack Start

A step-by-step guide to building a full-stack app with TanStack Start

Follow this step-by-step guide to building a full-stack recipe application with TanStack Start, the new full-stack React framework.

David Omotayo
Sep 30, 2025 â‹… 27 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply