2024-06-04
2776
#rust
Chigozie Oduah
176891
109
Jun 4, 2024 â‹… 9 min read

Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more

Chigozie Oduah Technical writer | Frontend developer | Blockchain developer

Recent posts:

Can native web APIs replace custom components in 2025?

Learn how native web APIs such as dialog, details, and Popover bring accessibility, performance, and simplicity without custom components.

Daniel Schwarz
Sep 12, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
too many tools: How to manage frontend tool overload

Too many tools: How to manage frontend tool overload

Read about how the growth of frontend development created so many tools, and how to manage tool overload within your team.

Shalitha Suranga
Sep 11, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
shruti kapoor the modern ai stack

What you actually need to build and ship AI-powered apps in 2025

Discover what you actually need to build and ship AI-powered apps in 2025, with tips for which tools to choose and how to implement them.

Shruti Kapoor
Sep 10, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Sept 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of September 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Sep 10, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Comparing Rust vs. Zig: Performance, safety, and more"

  1. A factor not considered here is ease of use.

    Rust is a monster of a language that straddles multiple paradigms, and the borrow checker imposes restrictions on how you design. It is going to take the average developer significant time and work before they can produce elegant solutions in the Rust idiom. The learning curve can be compared to C++.

    Zig is a much more minimal and familiar type of procedural language, leaving more mental overhead free for actually solving the problem in hand. The learning curve can be compared to C.

  2. Rust uses a lot of checks for safety and its syntax is quite complex. For safety reasons, runtime performance may be affected. If you only write safe code, you can feel the reward of using Rust, but sometimes performance decreases due to unnecessary safety. If you use unsafe code to prevent this, performance will be faster, but the meaning of using Rust will fade. In light of this, people like to use Rust like C/C++. To make it selectively safe and fast. So why not just use C/C++ or Zig? It’s much easier, simpler, and basically just faster, right? When using Rust, I often feel like I need to program just to program. Every time, I miss C very much. Rust is an attractive language, but objectively speaking, it is a language that makes programming difficult… Reducing programming mistakes is up to each individual, and I believe that a good programming language is one that is as simple, convenient, and fast as possible. I hope you have a great day today!

Leave a Reply