2022-05-18
1760
#css
Nelson Michael
106484
May 18, 2022 ⋅ 6 min read

BEM vs. SMACSS: Comparing CSS methodologies

Nelson Michael Nelson Michael is a frontend developer from Nigeria. When he's not meddling with CSS, he spends his time writing, sharing what he knows, and playing games.

Recent posts:

react 19.2 what is new and what to expect

React 19.2 is here: Activity API, useEffectEvent and more

Discover what’s new in React 19.2, which features long-awaited features like the Activity API and the useEffectEvent Hook.

David Omotayo
Oct 13, 2025 ⋅ 7 min read
ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Oct 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of October September 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Oct 13, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read

Hooks vs. Signals: The great reactivity convergence explained

React Hooks and SolidJS Signals solve reactivity differently. Learn how each manages state and updates, and when to choose one approach over the other.

Isaac Okoro
Oct 10, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read

Exploring the new Chakra UI MCP Server

Discover how the Chakra UI MCP server integrates AI into your editor, reducing context switching and accelerating development by fetching real-time documentation, component data, and code insights directly in-app.

Emmanuel John
Oct 9, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "BEM vs. SMACSS: Comparing CSS methodologies"

  1. I’m really against any naming methodologies. Modern CSS-in-JS solutions simply remove this overhead. The best conventions are the ones that are not needed!

  2. “and you can change the appearance and behavior of components to fit the context they’re placed in using modifiers.”

    This is plain wrong because BEM does not allow cascading. So one would need to add the modifier to every element. This results in an extreme overhead of both HTML class attributes and matching css selectors.

Leave a Reply