Editor’s note: This post was last updated on 10 July 2023 to be accurate with the updates in Babel 7.21.0.
Babel 7 was released in 2018 and since then, updates have allowed developers to use Babel and TypeScript without ever needing to complicate their builds with the TypeScript compiler. But what are the differences between using Babel and the TypeScript compiler? And should you use Babel or TypeScript for your next project? This article aims to answer these questions and more.
We’ll cover the following:
Babel is a widely used JavaScript compiler that enables developers to write modern JavaScript code using the latest ECMAScript features while ensuring compatibility with older browsers and environments.
As new JavaScript features are introduced, not all browsers support them immediately, which leads to potential compatibility issues for developers targeting broader audiences. Babel solves this problem by transforming modern JavaScript code into an older version of JavaScript that is widely supported across various browsers and environments. This process allows developers to use cutting-edge language features without sacrificing compatibility.
Here are the new updates since the latest feature at the time of writing, v7.21.0:
PrivateFieldsAsSymbols assumption for Classes: This update introduces the privateFieldAsSymbols assumption for classes, allowing private fields in classes to be treated as symbols. Private fields are declared using the # symbols before the field nameregexp modifiers proposal, which allows regular expressions to have custom flags or modifiersconst modifier in type parameters: TypeScript support in Babel now includes support for the const modifier in the type parameter. The const modifier can be used to specify that a type parameter should be treated as immutable, providing more expressive and robust typing capabilities in TypeScriptnew.target outside functions: Babel introduced a parser option that allows the usage of new.target outside functions. new.target is a special meta-property in JavaScript used to determine whether a function or constructor was called with the new keyword, and this option allows more flexible usage of this featureannex: false, to disable Annex B behavior. Annex B is a set of optional backward compatibility features in the ECMAScript specification, and this option allows developers to opt out of these behaviors, providing more control over the language features.cts as configuration file: Babel now supports the .cts file extension as a configuration file. Having more configuration file options allows developers to organize and manage their Babel configurations more efficiently, using the file extension that suits their project needsexport type* from in TypeScript: Babel now supports the export type * from syntax in TypeScript. This syntax allows re-exporting all named exports from one module to another, providing better modularity and reusability in TypeScript projectsThe TypeScript compiler, tsc, is responsible for transforming TypeScript code into plain JavaScript that can be executed by browsers or Node.js. Understanding how the TypeScript compiler works and the compilation process is essential for TypeScript developers to produce efficient and error-free JavaScript code.
Here’s an overview of the compilation process:
.ts) as input. These files contain TypeScript-specific syntax, including static typing annotations, interfaces, classes, and other TypeScript language featuresasync/await) into older JavaScript constructs for compatibility with different browsers and environments. The final output of the transformation phase is a new AST representing plain JavaScript code, without any TypeScript-specific constructs.js files with the transpiled JavaScript code.d.ts): Additionally, the TypeScript compiler may also generate declaration files (.d.ts) during the compilation process. Declaration files provide type information for external libraries or JavaScript modules, allowing TypeScript developers to use them seamlessly within their TypeScript projects..d.ts) as output. These files are now ready to be executed by browsers or Node.jsBabel plays a significant role in integrating TypeScript into JavaScript projects and workflows. While TypeScript provides static typing and advanced language features, Babel complements it by enabling transpilation of TypeScript code into widely supported versions of JavaScript.
Here’s how Babel contributes to the integration of TypeScript:
TypeScript introduces features that may not be natively supported in older browsers or specific environments. Babel acts as a transpiler, taking TypeScript code (with static typing, decorators, etc.) and converting it into equivalent JavaScript code.
The transpilation process ensures that the TypeScript features are transformed into syntax and constructs compatible with the target environment.
Many modern JavaScript projects use build tools like webpack, Rollup, or Parcel to bundle and optimize code. Babel integrates seamlessly with these build tools, allowing TypeScript code to be transpiled and included in the project’s build process.
Developers can leverage Babel plugins to fine-tune the transpilation process, making it compatible with the specific needs and requirements of the project.
Babel helps in the gradual migration of existing JavaScript projects to TypeScript. By setting up Babel to transpile TypeScript code, developers can introduce TypeScript incrementally to their projects without rewriting the entire codebase at once. This allows developers to benefit from TypeScript’s type checking and other language features in specific parts of the project as they transition to TypeScript.
Babel is commonly used in React.js development to support JSX syntax, which is not natively understood by browsers. JSX allows developers to write React components more intuitively.
When using TypeScript with React, Babel ensures that the JSX syntax in TypeScript files is properly transpiled, allowing developers to write JSX components in a TypeScript environment.
Babel’s extensive plugin ecosystem allows developers to add custom plugins and presets that cater to specific TypeScript use cases. Developers can choose from a range of plugins to support experimental TypeScript proposals, implement custom transformations, and fine-tune the transpilation process.
Babel often supports TypeScript features that are still in the proposal stage or not yet standardized by ECMAScript. This allows developers to experiment with new TypeScript features before they are officially adopted, giving them early access to the latest language capabilities.
Polyfilling is the process of adding code to support newer JavaScript features in environments that do not natively support them. It enables developers to use the latest ECMAScript features while maintaining compatibility with older browsers or environments that lack support for those features. Polyfills help bridge this gap by providing the missing functionality.
Babel provides an automatic polyfilling mechanism through the @babel/preset-env preset. When you configure Babel with @babel/preset-env, it automatically detects the ECMAScript features used in your code and includes the necessary polyfills only for the features that are missing in the target environment.
For example, if you use a modern ES6 feature like Promise in your code and the target environment lacks support for it, Babel’s auto polyfill will include a minimal and optimized polyfill for Promise in the output code. This approach ensures that your code runs correctly in older browsers that lack native Promise support.
The advantage of auto polyfilling is that it reduces the size of the output bundle by only including necessary polyfills, making the application more efficient.
TypeScript itself does not provide built-in polyfilling like Babel. TypeScript focuses on static type checking and transpilation, leaving polyfilling to be handled separately. TypeScript users typically use Babel as part of their build process, and Babel takes care of both transpilation and polyfilling using the @babel/preset-env.
When TypeScript code is transpiled by Babel, the auto polyfilling mechanism comes into play, ensuring that any missing features required by the TypeScript code are properly polyfilled. Additionally, TypeScript developers often use other tools, like core-js or @babel/polyfill, directly to include specific polyfills based on the project’s needs and the targeted environments.
To include explicit polyfills in a TypeScript project, you can import the necessary polyfills at the entry point of their application. For example:
import 'core-js'; // Import all core-js polyfills // or import 'core-js/features/promise'; // Import only the Promise polyfill
Using core-js or other polyfill libraries gives developers more control over which polyfills are included and allows them to customize the polyfilling behavior.
There are some major differences between using TypeScript and using TypeScript with Babel. We’ll look at the five most important differences.
Babel doesn’t care about your fancy TypeScript types. It just throws them in the trash, without checking that they’re right. The example below compiles without any errors or warnings with Babel, but not with TypeScript:
const myCoolString : string = 9;
9 is definitely not a string Babel. Removing the types can be excellent for quick prototyping where you want the code to compile, even if your types aren’t on point.
If you’re going through the effort of typing things, at some point you’ll probably want to check that they’re right. Luckily, this isn’t a big deal. You can either let your editor take care of it or run tsc --noEmit, which typechecks your project without compiling anything.
Learn more →const enumsBy default, TypeScript compiles an entire project at once, while Babel only compiles one file at a time. Previously, this meant that Babel did not support TypeScript features that required reading multiple files — such as const enums.
However, this is no longer true since Babel 7.15, which was released in 2021. This means that if you’re on the newest version of Babel, you should be able to compile all valid TypeScript codebases.
TypeScript was a bit early to the decorator party (if you’re unsure what a decorator is, this is a good introduction to decorators). After TypeScript implemented decorators, the decorator proposal has changed multiple times and is still not finalized.
What this means is that, currently, the ECMAScript spec and TypeScript don’t quite see eye-to-eye on how decorators should behave. Babel’s plugins follow the ECMAScript spec, which means that Babel doesn’t compile decorators the same way that TypeScript does. Luckily for us, Babel has a legacy mode to compile decorators with the old behavior. Simply add the Babel plugin "@babel/plugin-proposal-decorators" with the legacy option set to true.
There’s one other TypeScript decorators feature we should talk about: emitDecoratorMetadata. TypeScript normally erases all type information so it doesn’t exist at runtime. emitDecoratorMetadata is a feature that keeps the types around for classes and methods that have a decorator applied to them.
Having the type at runtime allows us to do all sorts of fancy things, such as dependency injection and mapping the TypeScript types to types in an SQL database. The feature sees reasonably heavy use in those two areas, with libraries such as TypeORM, TypeGoose, inversifyJS, and even Angular’s dependency injection system depending on this feature.
As Babel doesn’t care about your type information, this feature requires a custom plugin, babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata. Adding that plugin along with plugin-proposal-decorators, which we mentioned earlier, should give Babel feature parity with TypeScript in regards to decorators.
Babel is much more extensible than TypeScript. There are plenty of plugins that optimize your code and help you strip out unused imports, inlines, constants, and much more. While TypeScript has its own Transformer API, which allows for custom transformations, the Babel ecosystem is both richer in plugin choices and much more accessible.
If you need custom transformations, you’ll need to use Babel. The good news is that most TypeScript tools allow you to use TypeScript and then run the code through Babel afterwards, to get the best of both worlds. But this obviously comes with additional complexity in your build-chain.
Comparing Babel and TypeScript in regards to performance is difficult and probably won’t give you the full picture. TypeScript that performs type-checking will definitely be slower than Babel because there are extra steps included there.
To reach approximately equal speed, you can mitigate that slowdown by using something like fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin, which runs the compilation without types in one process and the type-checking in a background process.
Of course, as anyone who’s tried to configure webpack knows, JavaScript toolchains feel immensely complicated. You have source map plugins, caching, choices between how many threads you should use  —  the list goes on. No simple benchmark can take the full story into account, but if you’re expecting a many-fold increase using Babel over the TypeScript compiler, you’ll have to look for performance gains elsewhere  —  perhaps your bundler?
At this point, TypeScript and Babel are approximately equal in the role they can play in your build chain. Babel now has full support for const enums, decorators, and decorator metadata. The only downside to using Babel is that you will need to run your type-checking as a separate process.
If you already have a build pipeline that works for you, I don’t see any compelling reason to switch. However, if you’re starting out on a project, I would probably tend towards using the TypeScript compiler, potentially via something like ts-loader. Then later on if you find you need some transformation only Babel provides, you can pass the transpiled TypeScript output to Babel afterwards. It’s a little too complicated for my tastes, but hey  —  nobody ever said JavaScript build toolchains were easy.
Do you have any experiences with TypeScript and Babel? I’d love to hear about them. @GeeWengel
LogRocket is a frontend application monitoring solution that lets you replay problems as if they happened in your own browser. Instead of guessing why errors happen or asking users for screenshots and log dumps, LogRocket lets you replay the session to quickly understand what went wrong. It works perfectly with any app, regardless of framework, and has plugins to log additional context from Redux, Vuex, and @ngrx/store.
In addition to logging Redux actions and state, LogRocket records console logs, JavaScript errors, stacktraces, network requests/responses with headers + bodies, browser metadata, and custom logs. It also instruments the DOM to record the HTML and CSS on the page, recreating pixel-perfect videos of even the most complex single-page and mobile apps.
Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
Ding! You got a notification, but does it cause a little bump of dopamine or a slow drag of cortisol? […]
A guide for using JWT authentication to prevent basic security issues while understanding the shortcomings of JWTs.
Auth.js makes adding authentication to web apps easier and more secure. Let’s discuss why you should use it in your projects.
Compare Auth.js and Lucia Auth for Next.js authentication, exploring their features, session management differences, and design paradigms.
3 Replies to "Babel vs. TypeScript: Choosing the right compiler for your project"
Hey I came across your article and found the part on decorators and metadata very useful but I just thought I would let you know about this plugin: https://github.com/leonardfactory/babel-plugin-transform-typescript-metadata which they describe as ‘Babel plugin to emit decorator metadata like typescript compiler’.
Thanks for bringing this up! We’ve updated the blog post to include information on this plugin.
Nice article. Thank you