2023-03-17
2474
#react
Peter Ekene Eze
3599
Mar 17, 2023 ⋅ 8 min read

How React Hooks can replace React Router

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs text-wrap: pretty

When to use CSS text-wrap: balance vs. text-wrap: pretty

Compare and contrast two CSS components, text-wrap: balance and text-wrap: pretty, and discuss their benefits for better UX.

Daniel Schwarz
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Remix 3 ditched React: Should you stick with it?

Remix 3 ditches React for a Preact fork and a “Web-First” model. Here’s what it means for React developers — and why it’s controversial.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read

Autogen vs. Crew AI: Choosing the right agentic framework

A quick guide to agentic AI. Compare Autogen and Crew AI to build autonomous, tool-using multi-agent systems.

Kapeel Kokane
Nov 7, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read
ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Nov 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of November 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Nov 6, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "How React Hooks can replace React Router"

  1. In your first hooks routing code sample, the o e for routes.js, you forgot to reference each individual component. You import them but they’re not in each of the functions for that Routes object. So the 3 functions return nothing.

  2. How would you setup your hooks router to support modal side panels (which slides out when url starts from /modal/.. for example)? It this possible to describe multiple switches (one will return previous url component, and another one will return modal url component) within one rules object? Is this possible to forcibly pass desired url to router like <Switch location={previousUrl}?

  3. This was a very helpful article thank you. I have encountered one issue with this though. My hook components keep getting called. using a components in a menu placing a break point in the export default function PaymentSettings(props) for example – will result in that breakpoint getting it continuously.

  4. This is cleaner compared to Routes usage for sure. However an issue that keeps coming up in larger applications is the number of components imported for a “routes” file, as it needs each component to render for every path defined. So the more routes you have the more components need importing, I’ve seen 1000’s of lines before with no options outside creating smaller modules or a key based component directory. It would be nice to see this tackled in some other way, if you have any ideas how hooks might help here that would be great?

    Thanks
    JB

  5. Very nice post.
    But I will stay on react-router because I’m using typescript.
    the documentation page states that future releases of hookrouter will not necessarily update the types/hookrouter module

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now