2020-02-28
1808
#react
Leonardo Maldonado
14912
Feb 28, 2020 ⋅ 6 min read

Why you shouldn’t use inline styling in production React apps

Leonardo Maldonado Fullstack developer. JavaScript, React, TypeScript, GraphQL.

Recent posts:

master state management hydration Nuxt usestate

Nuxt state management and hydration with useState

useState can effectively replace ref in many scenarios and prevent Nuxt hydration mismatches that can lead to unexpected behavior and errors.

Yan Sun
Jan 20, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
React Native List Components: FlashList, FlatList, And More

React Native list components: FlashList, FlatList, and more

Explore the evolution of list components in React Native, from `ScrollView`, `FlatList`, `SectionList`, to the recent `FlashList`.

Chimezie Innocent
Jan 16, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read
Building An AI Agent For Your Frontend Project

Building an AI agent for your frontend project

Explore the benefits of building your own AI agent from scratch using Langbase, BaseUI, and Open AI, in a demo Next.js project.

Ivaylo Gerchev
Jan 15, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
building UI sixty seconds shadcn framer ai

Building a UI in 60 seconds with Shadcn and Framer AI

Demand for faster UI development is skyrocketing. Explore how to use Shadcn and Framer AI to quickly create UI components.

Peter Aideloje
Jan 14, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
View all posts

4 Replies to "Why you shouldn’t use inline styling in production React apps"

  1. Your argument against inline styles because of limitations with argument passing appears somewhat flawed; or am I misunderstanding something here?

    “`
    const Button = ({ backgroundColor }) => {
    return (

    My Button

    );
    };
    “`

  2. I don’t see inline styles not “looking good” because you used a ternary operator. Actually, you could do a small refactor it to be just as you did on your CSS-in-JS approach and you code will look the same.

    I’d say you can use inline styling for minor changes on not-reusable components or for styles you don’t want be available to be changed, like giving div a flex property rather than create a React component or a CSS classes only to this end. If you need more complexity than you can move to a more featured place: CSS-in-JS or whatever, but it’s easier to start from basic and then evolve as soons as you need more power.

  3. This is exactly what I was thinking… he also says that using the ternary “grows the component size” but it actually doesn’t result in any more lines of code. In fact it results in less lines of code. It also is very readable, I would argue that it’s more readable than the styled component version because it doesn’t need a special syntax unique to the styled component library, instead it is taking advantage of a feature native to the javascript language.

  4. There are libraries that allow devs to access all of CSS features with inline styles, so that’s not a real concern. And you keep saying that inline styles aren’t “performant” but never offer a single reason as to why their performance is worse. You also don’t provide any reason as to why inline styles aren’t “scalable”. This is just a really low quality article, and it’s sad because it’s also the first search result in google.

    “the inline styling might slow you and your coworkers down a little bit to create new components or maintain those that already exist.” Again, WHY? You make so many claims in this article and never even attempt to substantiate them in any way. It’s ridiculous.

    “One of the jobs of developers is to try to find the most performant solution” This is just flat out wrong. As a developer you don’t need to find the “most performant” solution, in fact it’s often a huge waste of time. Why? Because users don’t care if your application takes 10 ms to run instead of 1 ms to run. Computers are very fast. What is important is implementing features quickly, not implementing quick features.

Leave a Reply