2022-09-27
3445
#node#typescript
Ganesh Mani
33247
Sep 27, 2022 ⋅ 12 min read

Understanding design patterns in TypeScript and Node.js

Ganesh Mani I'm a full-stack developer, Android application/game developer, and tech enthusiast who loves to work with current technologies in web, mobile, the IoT, machine learning, and data science.

Recent posts:

Leveraging Typescript Branded Types For Stronger Type Checks

Leveraging TypeScript branded types for stronger type checks

Branded types in TypeScript allow us to write code more clearly, provide more type-safe solutions, and maintain our code more efficiently.

Rashedul Alam
Jul 16, 2024 ⋅ 5 min read
Zoneless Change Detection In Angular 18

Zoneless change detection in Angular 18

Angular v18 introduced an experimental feature called zoneless change detection, eliminating the need for Zone.js.

Yan Sun
Jul 15, 2024 ⋅ 5 min read
Developing Cross Platform Apps With Bun Version 1.1

Developing cross-platform apps with Bun v1.1

For some years now, developers have faced many performance challenges while using traditional JavaScript runtimes like Node.js and Deno. Even […]

Clara Ekekenta
Jul 12, 2024 ⋅ 6 min read
Exploring The Magic Of Runes In Svelte 5

Exploring the magic of runes in Svelte 5

See how to use Svelte 5’s new runes system to declare reactive states and compare them to the existing approach to reactivity in Svelte 4.

Yashodhan Joshi
Jul 11, 2024 ⋅ 7 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Understanding design patterns in TypeScript and Node.js"

  1. Singleton is antipattern, actually. At least in the described form. Makes testing really hard, creates hidden dependencies…
    If you have a dependency container, it can handle providing single instance of a service. This is a better form of singleton.

  2. The Singleton getInstance() implementation as presented may not work as expected depending on how MongoClient.connect is implemented. If the callback for .connect is invoked some time later when the connection is established (as is typical), then “this.instance” will not be set in time for the “return this.instance” line. If the assumption or behavior here is that getInstance() should return a promise that resolves to the client connection then the MongoClient.connect call should be wrapped in a “new Promise(…)” that resolves to mongo client inside the connect callback or rejects with an error from the callback.

  3. Singleton and Builder design patterns do not go well in javascript.
    Javascript has object literals, which solves the verbosity constructors with long parameter lists, funnily enough you gave an example of this User taking IUser object.
    And singleton is just a convoluted way to do something that is already solved by javascript modules.
    Each module is already a singleton imported via a path.
    It can export a class through the module, but that’s just extra unnecessary code.

    Please keep the Java/C# design patterns out of idiomatic javascript.

    Also Utill classes are not idiomatic javascript which has first cass support for functions.

Leave a Reply