
A developer’s retrospective on creating an AI video transcription agent with Mastra, an open-source TypeScript framework for building AI agents.

Learn how TanStack DB transactions ensure data consistency on the frontend with atomic updates, rollbacks, and optimistic UI in a simple order manager app.

useEffect mistakesDiscover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 5th issue.

useEffect mistakes to avoid in your React appsShruti Kapoor breaks down the confusion around useEffect and goes over 15 common mistakes she’s seen in the React apps she’s reviewed.
Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
3 Replies to "Returning null from setState in React 16"
Point of clarification for someone relatively new to React: am I correct to say that it is not necessary to return null with setstate in the way described in this article when the [unchanging] state value(s) are members of a mapped list (where each member in the list has been assigned a unique key)? Or restated, is it the case that a mapped list, where each element in the list is assigned a unique key, only updates those elements where a state change has occurred, and so the technique explained by this article would not be necessary for unchanging elements of a mapped list even when other elements in the list undergo state changes?
Great article, by the way. Everything makes sense. My question is mostly to make sure I have everything straight when it comes to state updates.
Why not just completely skip the setState call if new === current mocktail?
Yeah