2023-03-17
2474
#react
Peter Ekene Eze
3599
Mar 17, 2023 ⋅ 8 min read

How React Hooks can replace React Router

Peter Ekene Eze Learn, Apply, Share

Recent posts:

podrocket 2-18

How developer platforms fail (and how yours won’t)

Russ Miles, a software development expert and educator, joins the show to unpack why “developer productivity” platforms so often disappoint.

Elizabeth Becz
Feb 18, 2026 ⋅ 52 sec read
the replay february 18

The Replay (2/18/26): Copilot workarounds, platform pitfalls, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 18th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 18, 2026 ⋅ 36 sec read
andrew evans claude copilot

Can’t use Claude at work? How I recreated “Skills” in GitHub Copilot

Learn how to recreate Claude Skills–style workflows in GitHub Copilot using custom instruction files and smarter context management.

Andrew Evans
Feb 18, 2026 ⋅ 13 min read

How Ralph makes Claude Code actually finish tasks

Claude Code is deceptively capable. Point it at a codebase, describe what you need, and it’ll autonomously navigate files, write […]

Ikeh Akinyemi
Feb 17, 2026 ⋅ 4 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "How React Hooks can replace React Router"

  1. In your first hooks routing code sample, the o e for routes.js, you forgot to reference each individual component. You import them but they’re not in each of the functions for that Routes object. So the 3 functions return nothing.

  2. How would you setup your hooks router to support modal side panels (which slides out when url starts from /modal/.. for example)? It this possible to describe multiple switches (one will return previous url component, and another one will return modal url component) within one rules object? Is this possible to forcibly pass desired url to router like <Switch location={previousUrl}?

  3. This was a very helpful article thank you. I have encountered one issue with this though. My hook components keep getting called. using a components in a menu placing a break point in the export default function PaymentSettings(props) for example – will result in that breakpoint getting it continuously.

  4. This is cleaner compared to Routes usage for sure. However an issue that keeps coming up in larger applications is the number of components imported for a “routes” file, as it needs each component to render for every path defined. So the more routes you have the more components need importing, I’ve seen 1000’s of lines before with no options outside creating smaller modules or a key based component directory. It would be nice to see this tackled in some other way, if you have any ideas how hooks might help here that would be great?

    Thanks
    JB

  5. Very nice post.
    But I will stay on react-router because I’m using typescript.
    the documentation page states that future releases of hookrouter will not necessarily update the types/hookrouter module

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now