
Learn how ChatGPT’s new browser Atlas fits into a frontend developer’s toolkit, including the debugging and testing process.

Users don’t think in terms of frontend or backend; they just see features. This article explores why composition, not reactivity, is becoming the core organizing idea in modern UI architecture.

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 19th issue.

Jack Herrington writes about how React 19.2 rebuilds async handling from the ground up with use(),
Hey there, want to help make our blog better?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
2 Replies to "Organizing TypeScript code using namespaces"
What I don’t understand, in 2021 why would you not use modules in every scenario. You’ve said for codebase that is only being patched namespaces are preferable over modules, but who said that, and why is that? I’d prefer modules regardless of where the code is in its lifecycle and I cannot think of a disadvantage in keeping everything tightly scoped. I think you need to expand on that as in your whole article it’s the only part that gives any reason why you would use this strategy atall.
Namespaces is a legacy feature which wouldn’t make it if typescript was created today.