
A quick comparison of five AI code review tools tested on the same codebase to see which ones truly catch bugs and surface real issues.

corner-shapeLearn about CSS’s corner-shape property and how to use it, as well as the more advanced side of border-radius and why it’s crucial to using corner-shape effectively.

An AI reality check, Prisma v7, and “caveman compression”: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 26th issue.

RippleJS takes a fresh approach to UI development with no re-renders and TypeScript built in. Here’s why it’s gaining attention.
Hey there, want to help make our blog better?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
2 Replies to "Organizing TypeScript code using namespaces"
What I don’t understand, in 2021 why would you not use modules in every scenario. You’ve said for codebase that is only being patched namespaces are preferable over modules, but who said that, and why is that? I’d prefer modules regardless of where the code is in its lifecycle and I cannot think of a disadvantage in keeping everything tightly scoped. I think you need to expand on that as in your whole article it’s the only part that gives any reason why you would use this strategy atall.
Namespaces is a legacy feature which wouldn’t make it if typescript was created today.