
Russ Miles, a software development expert and educator, joins the show to unpack why “developer productivity” platforms so often disappoint.

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 18th issue.

Learn how to recreate Claude Skills–style workflows in GitHub Copilot using custom instruction files and smarter context management.

Claude Code is deceptively capable. Point it at a codebase, describe what you need, and it’ll autonomously navigate files, write […]
Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?
Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.
Sign up now
2 Replies to "Organizing TypeScript code using namespaces"
What I don’t understand, in 2021 why would you not use modules in every scenario. You’ve said for codebase that is only being patched namespaces are preferable over modules, but who said that, and why is that? I’d prefer modules regardless of where the code is in its lifecycle and I cannot think of a disadvantage in keeping everything tightly scoped. I think you need to expand on that as in your whole article it’s the only part that gives any reason why you would use this strategy atall.
Namespaces is a legacy feature which wouldn’t make it if typescript was created today.