2022-05-05
2868
#aws#node#react
Antonello Zanini
105616
May 5, 2022 ⋅ 10 min read

Multipart uploads with S3 in Node.js and React

Antonello Zanini I'm a software engineer, but I prefer to call myself a technology bishop. Spreading knowledge through writing is my mission.

Recent posts:

Comparison between TanStack Start and Next.js — two modern full-stack React frameworks with different architectural approaches.

TanStack Start vs. Next.js: Choosing the right full-stack React framework

TanStack Start vs. Next.js: both are powerful full-stack React frameworks, but they take fundamentally different approaches to architecture, routing, and developer experience. This guide breaks down their core features from SSR and data fetching to TypeScript support and deployment, to help you choose the right tool for your next React project.

Abiola Farounbi
Jun 12, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
Angular v20 might seem boring…here are 5 reasons it’s not

Angular v20 might seem boring — Here are 6 reasons it’s not

While it may seem like a maintenance update, Angular v20 is packed with practical, production-ready upgrades that will enable us to build apps faster and with more confidence.

Yan Sun
Jun 12, 2025 ⋅ 8 min read
vibe based ui building with google stitch

Vibe-based UI building with Google Stitch — Is this the future of frontend?

Build a responsive, multi-page e-commerce site with Stitch, Google’s new AI-powered UI design and development tool.

Emmanuel John
Jun 11, 2025 ⋅ 29 min read
Vercel-level deployment without Vercel-level prices

Get Vercel-level deployment without Vercel-level prices

Explore how to build and deploy a Next.js app to Cloudflare Workers to enjoy Vercel-like performance with more flexibility and lower costs.

Elijah Asaolu
Jun 11, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

22 Replies to "Multipart uploads with S3 in Node.js and React"

  1. When I try to access the etag header on the upload response, I get “Refused to get unsafe header “ETag”. Seems the destination has cors configured and will not let me get the etag. Not sure how you got around this problem?

  2. Hi, I am the author of the article!
    If you get the error when trying to upload a portion of the file with a pre-signed URL, it means that it must be due to a wrong configuration on S3.

  3. i cloned your repo to run locally. It doesn’t seem to work for me when I try uploading a file > 5MB; it gets stuck in the middle(~35%, depending on the file size). Am I missing anything?

    1. Hey! It’s the author of the article here.
      Could you please expand on what error you get?
      Also, make sure your S3-like provider support multiple upload and your Internet connection doesn’t fail.

  4. Thank you for your response. I was able to fix the issue by adding “ExposeHeaders”: [ “ETag”] in the bucket CORS policy. Adding it here for someone who might come across the same problem.

  5. What possible solution could be to make an API call from useEffect after the file is uploaded 100% and the finalizeMultipartUpload API is executed successfully? My API require file to be available in the bucket, and i don’t want to call the API inside the class. Any input would be appreciated.

    1. You could extend Uploader to accept a callback in videoUploaderOptions. This function will be called after
      await api.request({
      url: “/uploads/finalizeMultipartUpload”,
      method: “POST”,
      data: videoFinalizationMultiPartInput,
      })

  6. Nice article! Here presigned URLs were created by the service so we offloaded the server from upload work hence making it scalable solution. What do you think about the download part (multiple files as zip), should that also be done via presigned URLs?

    1. Thanks! I’m the author here!

      When it comes to downloading, presigned URLs are particularly useful to share files to users that don’t have access to the bucket. But, you could also use them to download a very large file, one chunk at a time.

  7. Hey I am getting this error. Proxy error: Could not proxy request /uploads/initializeMultipartUpload from localhost:3000 to http://localhost:3001.
    I have below config.
    frontend/uti/upload.js
    const api = axios.create({
    baseURL: “http://localhost:3000”,
    })
    backend/controller/upload.js
    const s3Endpoint = new AWS.Endpoint(“https://”)
    package.json
    “proxy”: “http://localhost:3001/”

      1. Hi Yes I started both npm run backend:start and npm run frontend:start.
        At browser its giving error as “XML Parsing Error: syntax error
        Location: http://localhost:3000/uploads/initializeMultipartUpload
        Line Number 1, Column 1:”

        At backend terminal its giving error: [nodemon] app crashed – waiting for file changes before starting…
        errno: -3008,
        code: ‘NetworkingError’,
        syscall: ‘getaddrinfo’,

        At frontend terminal its giving error as: Proxy error: Could not proxy request /uploads/initializeMultipartUpload from localhost:3000 to http://127.0.0.1:3001/.
        See https://nodejs.org/api/errors.html#errors_common_system_errors for more information (ECONNRESET).

    1. Right now, it would faild, but you can easily change that by updating the login below:

      From
      this.sendChunk(chunk, part, sendChunkStarted)
      .then(() => {
      this.sendNext()
      })
      .catch((error) => {
      this.parts.push(part)

      this.complete(error)
      })

      To
      this.sendChunk(chunk, part, sendChunkStarted)
      .then(() => {
      this.sendNext()
      })
      .catch((error) => {
      this.parts.push(part)
      })

  8. cess to XMLHttpRequest at ” from origin ‘http://localhost:3000’ has been blocked by CORS policy: Response to preflight request doesn’t pass access control check: No ‘Access-Control-Allow-Origin’ header is present on the requested resource.

  9. Great article. I tested it and I’m getting a BAD REQUEST on the OPTIONS which is the CORS preflight done by the browser on the S3 bucket.
    As I debug it can you let me know if the OPTIONS request is supposed to be sent or maybe is some kind of configuration on my side which triggers it?

Leave a Reply