2020-11-17
2193
#react
Diogo Souza
29027
Nov 17, 2020 ⋅ 7 min read

Creating micro-frontend apps with single-spa

Diogo Souza Brazilian dev. Creator of altaluna.com.br

Recent posts:

lewis angular signal forms

Signal Forms: Angular’s best quality of life update in years

Signal Forms in Angular 21 replace FormGroup pain and ControlValueAccessor complexity with a cleaner, reactive model built on signals.

Lewis Cianci
Feb 25, 2026 ⋅ 10 min read
replay 2 25 26

The Replay (2/25/26): Signal Forms, Ralph to the rescue, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 25th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 25, 2026 ⋅ 32 sec read

Google & Shopify’s UCP: How AI agents sell online

Explore how the Universal Commerce Protocol (UCP) allows AI agents to connect with merchants, handle checkout sessions, and securely process payments in real-world e-commerce flows.

Emmanuel John
Feb 24, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
6 React Server Component performance pitfalls in Next.js

6 React Server Component performance pitfalls in Next.js

React Server Components and the Next.js App Router enable streaming and smaller client bundles, but only when used correctly. This article explores six common mistakes that block streaming, bloat hydration, and create stale UI in production.

Temitope Oyedele
Feb 23, 2026 ⋅ 13 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "Creating micro-frontend apps with single-spa"

  1. Hi Diogo,

    thank you for this example, but it is not working anymore if following this guide step by step.

    Here is the error I am getting when running apps and going to localhost:9000: resolve.js:12 Uncaught (in promise) Error: Unable to resolve bare specifier ‘@LogRocket/root-config’ – screenshot https://prnt.sc/x8eiu5

    I made everything same way as in your example, even the names of the apps and org, just to be sure. Here is my example code – https://github.com/igorbuts/single-spa-test

    What I noticed in my example comparing to yours (from comment above) that all the libraries which name is starting with webpack- differ in major version. Maybe the made some breaking changes….
    Because If I clone your example – it is working.

    When I try in my example to downgrade libs to the versions of your example I get some new errors.

  2. Hey Igor, that’s really weird.

    I’ve cloned your repo and tried to analyze every single file, comparing it with mine, but nothing was different and yet the error persists.

    Then, I’ve created another one from scratch following the same steps in the article and, this time, was ok.

    I guess something has bugged within the Webpack or config files. Please, try it out too. In another folder, redo the process and let me know if that works.

    Cheers.

  3. @Team, Its really a great work you did it. Thanks for the article. I am having one issue in this. Application setup is fine and working. But every navigation it is reloading the page. I don’t want page reloading when we navigate between any routes. Can you please help me to fix this. Please find the attached video for your reference

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now