2020-07-07
2712
#typescript
Emanuel Suriano
21392
Jul 7, 2020 โ‹… 9 min read

Dynamic type validation in TypeScript

Emanuel Suriano Hi ๐Ÿ‘‹ I build stuff with JavaScript ๐Ÿ’ป Once a month I write an article โœ๏ธ and sometimes I give talks ๐Ÿ’ฌ

Recent posts:

i tried kiro and here is what i learned

I tried out Kiro: Hereโ€™s what I learned

Check out Kiro, AWS’s AI-powered IDE, see what makes it different from other AI coding tools, and explore whether it lives up to the hype.

Elijah Asaolu
Aug 28, 2025 โ‹… 5 min read
Go Design Pattern Article Image With Logo

Why Go design patterns still matter

Here’s how three design patterns solved our Go microservices scaling problems without sacrificing simplicity.

Peter Aideloje
Aug 28, 2025 โ‹… 2 min read
how to protect your ai agent from prompt injection attacks

How to protect your AI agent from prompt injection attacks

Explore six principled design patterns (with real-world examples) to help you protect your LLM agents from prompt injection attacks.

Rosario De Chiara
Aug 27, 2025 โ‹… 5 min read
Donโ€™t Let AI Erase The Next Generation Of Dev Leaders

Donโ€™t let AI erase the next generation of dev leaders

As AI tools take over more routine coding work, some companies are cutting early-career dev roles โ€” a short-sighted move that could quietly erode the next generation of tech leaders if we arenโ€™t careful.

Jack Herrington
Aug 26, 2025 โ‹… 6 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Dynamic type validation in TypeScript"

  1. In frontend we are very good in making stuff ultra complex ๐Ÿ™

    Your “typescript isse” is not a typescript issue, because you simply dont type your service. For that you can use autogenerating their DTO into types, libs like ‘dtsgenerator’ just need the open api spec of the resource api. Problem solved. Just automate more, write less code and dont inject another dep which is only overhead.

  2. Nice post,

    I’m the author of this project [typescript-field-validation](https://www.npmjs.com/package/typescript-field-validation) which aims to solve (some of) these issues. I’ve taken a different approach, rather than validate the incoming data against an openAPI schema, simply constrain the fields you need to use as non nullable and assume the value must be the resulting type as defined in the specification. Yes it defines new syntax, but it’s just dot notation and the same array syntax we already use in Typescript, no big deal. Compared to some of the above mentioned packages, this simple tool might be all you need to wrangle those enormous auto-generated schema types into constrained types with non optional and non nullable fields. At a minimum performing these checks upfront could help clean up hundreds of null checks peppered throughout many code bases.

  3. I like the approach,

    My case is little bit different I generate all of the types from the open api.This is huge help and covers generates all of the necessary types. How ever, we have a form of which data needs to be eventually typed to RestCreateType. With dynamic validation I can take RestCreateType generate validation schema and avoid additional work and lower code dependency on generated types.

Leave a Reply