2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 â‹… 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

Building multi-region infrastructure with AWS

This isn’t theory. It’s the exact setup you need to deliver fast, resilient apps across AWS regions with zero fluff.

Marie Starck
May 13, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
the nine best FaunaDB alternatives for 2025

The 9 best FaunaDB alternatives for 2025

Looking for a FaunaDB alternative to migrate to? Examine nine other platforms you can use and factors to consider when choosing an alternative.

Nefe Emadamerho-Atori
May 13, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
Techniques To Circulate And Record Knowledge In Engineering Teams

Techniques to circulate and record knowledge in engineering teams

From onboarding to bug tracking, these knowledge-sharing techniques keep your team aligned, reduce overhead, and build long-term technical clarity.

Marie Starck
May 12, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
WebSockets Tutorial With Node And React

React WebSocket tutorial: Real-time messaging with WebSockets and Socket.IO

Learn how to build a real-time collaborative document editing app with a Node.js backend and React frontend using the WebSocket protocol.

Avanthika Meenakshi
May 12, 2025 â‹… 15 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply