2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 â‹… 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

Gemini CLI tutorial — Will it replace Windsurf and Cursor?

Gemini CLI tutorial — Will it replace Windsurf and Cursor?

Discover how to use Gemini CLI, Google’s new open-source AI agent that brings Gemini directly to your terminal.

Chizaram Ken
Jul 10, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
React & TypeScript: 10 Patterns For Writing Better Code

React & TypeScript: 10 patterns for writing better code

This article explores several proven patterns for writing safer, cleaner, and more readable code in React and TypeScript.

Peter Aideloje
Jul 10, 2025 â‹… 11 min read
A Guide To Wrapper Vs. Container Classes In CSS

A guide to wrapper vs. container classes in CSS

A breakdown of the wrapper and container CSS classes, how they’re used in real-world code, and when it makes sense to use one over the other.

Temitope Oyedele
Jul 7, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
Stagehand and Gemini logos on a gradient background symbolizing AI web automation

How to build a web-based AI agent with Stagehand and Gemini

This guide walks you through creating a web UI for an AI agent that browses, clicks, and extracts info from websites powered by Stagehand and Gemini.

Elijah Asaolu
Jul 4, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply