2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 ⋅ 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

How to build agentic AI when your data can’t leave the network

Large hosted LLMs aren’t always an option. Learn how to build agentic AI with small, local models that preserve privacy and scale.

Rosario De Chiara
Dec 23, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
frontend wrapped top stories of 2025

Frontend Wrapped 2025: The 10 storylines that defined the year

What storylines defined 2025 in frontend development? We power rank them all, from AI advancements to supply chain attacks and framework breakthroughs.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 23, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
Getting Started With NativeWind: Tailwind For React Native

Getting started with NativeWind: Tailwind for React Native

Learn how to style React Native apps with Tailwind using NativeWind v4.

Chinwike Maduabuchi
Dec 22, 2025 ⋅ 14 min read
The 10 Best React Native Component Libraries You Should Know

The 10 best React Native UI libraries of 2026

A practical guide to the best React Native UI libraries in 2026, with comparisons across performance, theming, accessibility, and Expo compatibility.

Aman Mittal
Dec 22, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now