2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 ⋅ 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

chatgpt atlas for developers featured image

How to use ChatGPT Atlas for frontend debugging, testing, and more

Learn how ChatGPT’s new browser Atlas fits into a frontend developer’s toolkit, including the debugging and testing process.

Emmanuel John
Nov 20, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read

Why composition – not reactivity – leads UI’s future

Users don’t think in terms of frontend or backend; they just see features. This article explores why composition, not reactivity, is becoming the core organizing idea in modern UI architecture.

Oscar Jite-Orimiono
Nov 20, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read
the replay nov 19

The Replay (11/19/25): React 19.2 async, GitHub Octoverse, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 19th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 19, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read

React 19.2: The async shift is finally here

Jack Herrington writes about how React 19.2 rebuilds async handling from the ground up with use(), , useTransition(), and now View Transitions.

Jack Herrington
Nov 19, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now