2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 ⋅ 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

AI First Debugging

AI-first debugging: Tools and techniques for faster root cause analysis

AI-first debugging augments traditional debugging with log clustering, pattern recognition, and faster root cause analysis. Learn where AI helps, where it fails, and how to use it safely in production.

Alexander Godwin
Dec 29, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

Container queries in 2026: Powerful, but not a silver bullet

Container queries let components respond to their own layout context instead of the viewport. This article explores how they work and where they fit alongside media queries.

Sebastian Weber
Dec 26, 2025 ⋅ 12 min read
Server Components Vs Islands Architecture LogRocket

Server Components vs. Islands Architecture: The performance showdown

React Server Components vs Islands Architecture: Learn how each reduces client JavaScript, impacts hydration and interactivity, and which trade-offs matter for production performance.

Muhammed Ali
Dec 26, 2025 ⋅ 4 min read

How to build agentic AI when your data can’t leave the network

Large hosted LLMs aren’t always an option. Learn how to build agentic AI with small, local models that preserve privacy and scale.

Rosario De Chiara
Dec 23, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now