2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 â‹… 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

A Comprehensive Guide To JavaScript Generators

A comprehensive guide to JavaScript generators

JavaScript generators offer a powerful and often overlooked way to handle asynchronous operations, manage state, and process data streams.

Fimber Elemuwa
Jan 24, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
​​Solving Micro-Frontend Challenges With Module Federation

​​Solving micro-frontend challenges with Module Federation

webpack’s Module Federation allows you to easily share code and dependencies between applications, helpful in micro-frontend architecture.

Peter Aideloje
Jan 23, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
typescript object destructuring

TypeScript object destructuring and you

Whether you’re part of the typed club or not, one function within TypeScript that can make life a lot easier is object destructuring.

Lewis Cianci
Jan 22, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
Using Firebase For ASP.NET Authentication

Using Firebase for ASP.NET authentication

Firebase is one of the most popular authentication providers available today. Meanwhile, .NET stands out as a good choice for […]

Lewis Cianci
Jan 21, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply