2022-06-13
2806
#nestjs
Yan Sun
115485
Jun 13, 2022 â‹… 10 min read

Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs

Yan Sun I am a full-stack developer. Love coding, learning, and writing.

Recent posts:

improving ux with scroll-select box

How to improve UX with a scroll-select box

The scroll-select box is a great tool for frontend developers to improve the user experience of their applications. Learn how to build a scrollable date picker that mimics the iOS style, but with the exemption of the <select> element.

Emmanuel Odioko
Feb 7, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
Deploying Next.js apps with Deno Deploy

Deploying Next.js apps with Deno Deploy

For those just getting started with deploying their first application, Deno Deploy’s simplicity might be exactly what you need; no complex configuration files to wrestle with or cloud concepts to master before getting your app live.

Emmanuel Odioko
Feb 6, 2025 â‹… 5 min read
A Guide To Object.groupBy: An Alternative To Array.reduce

A guide to Object.groupBy: An alternative to Array.reduce

Learn how Object.groupBy and Map.groupBy improve JavaScript data grouping over reduce, with performance benchmarks and comparisons.

Sebastian Weber
Feb 5, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
Best CI/CD tools for React Native

Best CI/CD tools for React Native

Get a high-level comparison of five of the most popular and well-used CI/CD tools for React Native apps, including the features they support.

Hussain Arif
Feb 5, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
View all posts

6 Replies to "Comparing 4 popular NestJS ORMs"

    1. I am glad that you found the article useful.
      I used Prisma/NestJS for a recent personal App, and it works very well. It is just person preference (mainly because I like the full type safe queries). There are of course much more factors to be considered if the decision is for an Enterprise App.

  1. After using Prisma for quite some time now, I feel like overall the DSL and querying is not bad, although it has limitations that can be overcome but lead to worse performance. (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/4185)
    In comparison with knex, having a schema where we can see how the DB is supposed to look like is definitely nice. That said, the way we migrate the DB is not awesome. Generating migrations directly modifying the schema, falls in my mind into the “demo wowww” effect, but it has strong limitations. For example, when renaming a column, prisma cannot tell what you want to do. It will end up deleting the old column and create a new one. There are some work-arounds (https://www.basedash.com/blog/how-to-rename-a-table-or-column-using-prisma-migrations) but it shows the limitations of this abstraction: I think an imperative approach to migrate the DB (with a DSL) is superior than a declarative one.
    Also the fact, that we cannot use JS inside migrations means that this tool can only be used to change data structure but not so much migrate / move the existing data. When you want to do this (we had to and we will have to), the response (https://github.com/prisma/prisma/discussions/10854#discussioncomment-1865526) is to launch a Node Script against the DB. Problem with this is that you need to develop your own tooling like recording that a script was run not to run it multiple times (something prisma SQL migrations already cater for).
    All in all, I am still happy we went with prisma as opposed to knex. But I think some of the abstractions that were used fundamentally prevents this tool from being on par with other tools like Rails’ ActiveRecord for example

Leave a Reply