2021-02-15
1362
#angular
Chidume Nnamdi
34525
Feb 15, 2021 ⋅ 4 min read

Caching with HttpInterceptor in Angular

Chidume Nnamdi I'm a software engineer with over six years of experience. I've worked with different stacks, including WAMP, MERN, and MEAN. My language of choice is JavaScript; frameworks are Angular and Node.js.

Recent posts:

React Svelte Next JS

Remix vs. Next.js vs. SvelteKit

Compare key features of popular meta-frameworks Remix, Next.js, and SvelteKit, from project setup to styling.

Alex Merced
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 8 min read
replay feb 4

The Replay (2/4/26): AI-first leadership, Tailwind layoffs, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the February 4th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 37 sec read
ken pickering ai first organization

What it actually means to be an AI-first engineering organization

AI-first isn’t about tools; it’s about how teams think, build, and decide. Ken Pickering, CTO at Scripta Insights, shares how engineering leaders can adapt.

Ken Pickering
Feb 4, 2026 ⋅ 3 min read

How to build agentic frontend applications with CopilotKit

Build context-aware, agentic frontend applications by connecting React state and actions to LLMs with CopilotKit.

Emmanuel John
Feb 3, 2026 ⋅ 5 min read
View all posts

12 Replies to "Caching with HttpInterceptor in Angular"

  1. return next.handle(req).pipe(
    do(stateEvent => {
    if(stateEvent instanceof HttpResponse) {
    this.cache.set(req, stateEvent.clone())
    }
    })
    ).share()

    this line of code create issue can you update it for angular 13 the main problem is i sent requst to bind table and i delete item from table and sent request its get reponce from cache please tell me how to fix this type of issue

  2. Great article!

    I just had to change the Map type to `Map<string, HttpResponse>`, where string is `req.urlWithParams`. With these few tweaks I was able to get mine to work.

  3. This solution doesn’t work. Angular doesn’t pass the same HttpRequest instance between the same requests. So, you can’t cache using request object, need to use some combination of its fields.

    `share` at the end is needed to make `do` (or `tap`) run only once

    1. What about making the get full URL with parameters string has the key of the cache map ? That will identify the particular request

  4. Aside from the other issues highlighted in the comments, won’t this just grow memory with all the requests/responses? For an enterprise app, this means client side growth will be huge, and things will be cached even when we don’t want them to be.

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now