2022-11-03
1820
#typescript
Paul Cowan
139904
Nov 3, 2022 â‹… 6 min read

Write fewer tests by creating better TypeScript types

Paul Cowan Contract software developer.

Recent posts:

tanstack table react table

A complete guide to TanStack Table (formerly React Table)

Discover how to use TanStack Table, formerly known as React Table, to build a table UI for a variety of use cases.

Paramanantham Harrison
Mar 28, 2025 â‹… 14 min read
javascript object prototypes

JavaScript prototypes: How objects inherit properties and methods

Explore what prototypes are, how the prototype chain works, and how to use the prototype chain to create inheritance between objects.

Ibadehin Mojeed
Mar 28, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
set up Node.js with TypeScript and Express

How to set up TypeScript with Node.js and Express

Set up TypeScript with Node.js and Express, focusing on configuring key elements for a smooth development experience.

Aman Mittal
Mar 28, 2025 â‹… 9 min read
featured image tsx extension

What is the difference between a .ts and .tsx file extension?

Examine the differences between the .ts and .tsx file types, their use cases, and best practices for a React TypeScript project.

Hussain Arif
Mar 27, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
View all posts

One Reply to "Write fewer tests by creating better TypeScript types"

  1. Nice article I find good typechecking very helpful. However, having more code does not always mean that you have to more problems.

    Shared code that is to tightly coupled creates huge issues with business domain changes and refactoring.

    A properly decoupled system using MVVM that has proper Domain Drive Design and isolated business flows will help prevent unintended sideeffects as business needs change.

    Which may result in small portions of repeated code.

    This is prefered because business logic may change in a business flow and should not be shared across an entire application.

    DRY does not overide Single Resposibility and the scope you choose for SRP is important and should not bleed into different business flows with out a concrete reason.

    In MVVM this occurs fairly often at the view layer and even in the view-model.

    Each of the model, view and view-model layers can be tested and developed independently which enable paralalyzed development, AB testing, and easy refactoring.

    Tight type checking actually makes it more challenging to refactor and this is the reason kotlin was born.
    Kotlins loose type checking enable faster refactoring and iteration by enabling you to gaurd code blocks and domains with typechecks.

Leave a Reply