2022-11-03
1820
#typescript
Paul Cowan
139904
Nov 3, 2022 â‹… 6 min read

Write fewer tests by creating better TypeScript types

Paul Cowan Contract software developer.

Recent posts:

Why Go wasn’t the right choice for the TypeScript compiler

Why Go wasn’t the right choice for the TypeScript compiler

The switch to Go may be a pragmatic move in the short term, but it risks alienating the very developers who built the tools that made TypeScript indispensable in the first place.

Muhammed Ali
May 8, 2025 â‹… 4 min read
how and when to use type casting in TypeScript

How and when to use type casting in TypeScript

Discover the basics and advanced use cases of type casting, how and why to use it to fix type mismatches, and gain some clarity on casting vs. assertion.

Paul Akinyemi
May 8, 2025 â‹… 14 min read

How to format dates in JavaScript: Methods, libraries, and best practices

JavaScript date handling can be tough. Here are some native Date API tools and specialized libraries to tackle them with.

Nelson Michael
May 8, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
tailwind typography

How to use the Tailwind Typography plugin

Walk you through how to set up and use the Tailwind Typography plugin, also known as the @tailwindcss/typography or the prose plugin.

David Omotayo
May 7, 2025 â‹… 7 min read
View all posts

One Reply to "Write fewer tests by creating better TypeScript types"

  1. Nice article I find good typechecking very helpful. However, having more code does not always mean that you have to more problems.

    Shared code that is to tightly coupled creates huge issues with business domain changes and refactoring.

    A properly decoupled system using MVVM that has proper Domain Drive Design and isolated business flows will help prevent unintended sideeffects as business needs change.

    Which may result in small portions of repeated code.

    This is prefered because business logic may change in a business flow and should not be shared across an entire application.

    DRY does not overide Single Resposibility and the scope you choose for SRP is important and should not bleed into different business flows with out a concrete reason.

    In MVVM this occurs fairly often at the view layer and even in the view-model.

    Each of the model, view and view-model layers can be tested and developed independently which enable paralalyzed development, AB testing, and easy refactoring.

    Tight type checking actually makes it more challenging to refactor and this is the reason kotlin was born.
    Kotlins loose type checking enable faster refactoring and iteration by enabling you to gaurd code blocks and domains with typechecks.

Leave a Reply