2020-12-16
1346
#vanilla javascript
Victor Jonah
30678
Dec 16, 2020 ⋅ 4 min read

What is railway oriented programming?

Victor Jonah I am a Software Developer with over three years of experience working with JavaScript and its frameworks. I currently work as a remote software developer for a tech agency.

Recent posts:

the replay october 8

The Replay (10/8/25): Data enrichment, CSS is back, TypeScript 5.9

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the October 8th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Oct 8, 2025 ⋅ 30 sec read
Goodbye, messy data: An engineer’s guide to scalable data enrichment

Goodbye, messy data: An engineer’s guide to scalable data enrichment

Walk through building a data enrichment workflow that moves beyond simple lead gen to become a powerful internal tool for enterprises.

Alexandra Spalato
Oct 8, 2025 ⋅ 6 min read

DesignCoder and the future of AI-generated UI

From sketches to code in minutes, DesignCoder shows how AI-generated, hierarchy-aware UIs could change the way developers prototype and ship apps.

Rosario De Chiara
Oct 7, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read

Should you use if() functions in CSS?

It’s 2025, and CSS finally thinks logically. The if() function brings real conditional styling — no hacks, no JS workarounds. Here’s how to use it right.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Oct 7, 2025 ⋅ 16 min read
View all posts

5 Replies to "What is railway oriented programming?"

  1. In the last example, wouldn’t you still need to check isValidated before calling sendMail(), or maybe passing it in would be more in line with this design pattern? Or maybe I’m missing something, its late. 🙂

  2. Its is really unclear how the last example allows for decomposition of a single failure/sucess value to multiple firstname, lastname values

  3. Am I missing something? This seems like a basic overview of the Maybe Monad with respect to exceptions, but without any of the work shown. You haven’t given any mechanisms for ‘self-healing’, or dealing with the unhappy path at all, just that you CAN switch to one and that it’s better to write small functions than to throw all error handling into the main function.

  4. The principles of this “railroad” concept is nothing new. I was taught error handling like this over 30 years ago.

    One minor suggestion – rather than “success” or “failure”, the reality is that there is success, recoverable failure, non-recoverable unit failure, and non-recoverable app failure. The developer needs to determine if a failure is recoverable (e.g. login failure, connection timeout, etc.) or non-recoverable. If the latter, the developer needs to decide if the app is now unusable, or just one portion of it.

    Another suggestion – don’t just return success or failure. Include the appropriate enum flag, but also include in the return object details about what went wrong, such as all the error messages in the exception stack, snapshot values of runtime variables, what module, method, and line number the error occurred, etc., not only for logging, but for useful information for the user in a recoverable failure.

Leave a Reply