2020-03-05
2684
#css
Anna Monus
15206
Mar 5, 2020 â‹… 9 min read

Variable fonts: Is the performance trade-off worth it?

Anna Monus Anna is a technical writer who covers frontend frameworks, web standards, accessibility, WordPress development, UX design, and more. Head to her personal blog Annalytic for more content.

Recent posts:

Glowing 3D cube with the MediaPipe and React logos overlaid, symbolizing integration of AI and web development

How to build better AI apps in React with MediaPipe’s latest APIs

Learn how to integrate MediaPipe’s Tasks API into a React app for fast, in-browser object detection using your webcam.

Emmanuel John
Jul 17, 2025 â‹… 10 min read
Vercel AI SDK logo on a 3D black grid background

How to build unified AI interfaces using the Vercel AI SDK

Integrating AI into modern frontend apps can be messy. This tutorial shows how the Vercel AI SDK simplifies it all, with streaming, multimodal input, and generative UI.

Ikeh Akinyemi
Jul 16, 2025 â‹… 13 min read
how to prepare for a software engineering interview

How to prep for a software dev interview: Advice from a dev leader

Interviewing for a software engineering role? Hear from a senior dev leader on what he looks for in candidates, and how to prepare yourself.

Andrew Evans
Jul 16, 2025 â‹… 12 min read
Next.js Real-Time Video Streaming: HLS.js And Alternatives

Next.js real-time video streaming: HLS.js and alternatives

Set up real-time video streaming in Next.js using HLS.js and alternatives, exploring integration, adaptive streaming, and token-based authentication.

Jude Miracle
Jul 15, 2025 â‹… 19 min read
View all posts

3 Replies to "Variable fonts: Is the performance trade-off worth it?"

  1. I’m surprised that you were only able to find one font family with both static and variable versions, when there are quite a few out there, including, but not limited to Gimlet by David Jonathan Ross, Oswald hosted by Google fonts, and Zeitung by Underware.

    Not all variable fonts are created equally. Some are created with a much better emphasis on file size. I was shocked when you mentioned the huge size for Roboto variable, since this is not the normal for variable fonts. I have seen many under 100kb. Here’s an article here that shows how the Gimlet variable font is smaller in size than the static alternative (http://stuff.djr.com/gimlet-vf-size-test/).

    So by using only a single example of a font family that is out of the norm for file size, it can give a very misleading impression on the performance of variable fonts.

  2. > The first contentful paint took just 1.2s, down from 1.6s, a 25 percent improvement. Consequently, Lighthouse’s performance score is also a bit higher: 100 instead of 99. This is most likely because Google Fonts runs a few checks to decide which font format/file to load, while our self-hosted CSS contains static file paths.

    There is definitely a performance hit to using Google Fonts. See here: https://www.tunetheweb.com/blog/should-you-self-host-google-fonts/

    Good post though. Seems to me variable font makers need to be careful how many axis’s they add. If Roboto used italic (one variant which is on or off) rather than slant (12 variants with full range) would it be smaller? Also dropping wdth would also presumably make it up to a third smaller?

  3. I presume the Lighthouse First Contentful Paint (FCP) is larger than the GTMetrix Fully Loaded Time (FLT) because Lighthouse was set to simulate a slow mobile connection. But, why does the “Bonus Test Case” do so badly on the Lighthouse FCP (relative to Test cases 2 and 3) but not on the GTMetrix FLT?

Leave a Reply