2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

the replay graphic november 5

The Replay (11/5/25): Developer elitism, REST APIs, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the November 5th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Nov 5, 2025 ⋅ 32 sec read
lewis cianci quote developer elitism

It’s time to break the cycle of developer elitism

A senior developer discusses how developer elitism breeds contempt and over-reliance on AI, and how you can avoid it in your own workplace.

Lewis Cianci
Nov 5, 2025 ⋅ 13 min read
open ai agent kit

I tried OpenAI’s AgentKit: Does it make Zapier and n8n obsolete?

Examine AgentKit, Open AI’s new tool for building agents. Conduct a side-by-side comparison with n8n by building AI agents with each tool.

Clara Ekekenta
Nov 4, 2025 ⋅ 11 min read

A Jarvis for everyone: AI agents as new interfaces

AI agents powered by MCP are redefining interfaces, shifting from clicks to intelligent, context-aware conversations.

Peter Aideloje
Nov 4, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now