2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 â‹… 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

net maui 9 blazor

.NET MAUI 9 brings new improvements to Blazor

Developers can take advantage of the latest release of .NET MAUI 9 to build better user experiences that more accurately react and respond to changes in their applications.

Andrew Evans
Jan 30, 2025 â‹… 6 min read
Implementing React Islands In Static Web Applications

Implementing React Islands in static web applications

React Islands integrates React into legacy codebases, enabling modernization without requiring a complete rewrite.

Nelson Michael
Jan 28, 2025 â‹… 4 min read

Onlook: A React visual editor

Onlook bridges design and development, integrating design tools into IDEs for seamless collaboration and faster workflows.

Jude Miracle
Jan 27, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
A Comprehensive Guide To JavaScript Generators

A comprehensive guide to JavaScript generators

JavaScript generators offer a powerful and often overlooked way to handle asynchronous operations, manage state, and process data streams.

Fimber Elemuwa
Jan 24, 2025 â‹… 8 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply