2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

Building AI apps that remember: Mem0 vs Supermemory

Compare mem0 and Supermemory to learn how modern AI apps manage long-term memory beyond RAG and stateless LLM chats.

Kapeel Kokane
Jan 26, 2026 ⋅ 9 min read
how to animate svg with css

How to animate SVG with CSS: Tutorial with examples

Animate SVGs with pure CSS: hamburger toggles, spinners, line-draw effects, and new scroll-driven animations, plus tooling tips and fallbacks.

Hope Armstrong
Jan 23, 2026 ⋅ 16 min read
a dev’s guide to Tailwind CSS in 2026

A dev’s guide to Tailwind CSS in 2026

Tailwind CSS is more popular than ever. This guide breaks down v4’s biggest changes, real-world usage, migration paths, and where it fits in the AI future.

Oscar Jite-Orimiono
Jan 23, 2026 ⋅ 12 min read
react animation libraries 2026

Comparing the best React animation libraries for 2026

Evaluate the top React animation libraries for ease of use, developer experience, and bundle size.

Fortune Ikechi
Jan 22, 2026 ⋅ 21 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply

Hey there, want to help make our blog better?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now