2021-11-05
1436
#react
Aditya Agarwal
122
Nov 5, 2021 ⋅ 5 min read

Understanding React compound components

Aditya Agarwal Loves experimenting on the web. You can follow me on Twitter @hackerrank.

Recent posts:

A Guide To Async/Await In TypeScript

A guide to async/await in TypeScript

TypeScript’s async/await lets you write asynchronous code that reads like synchronous code, making it easier to understand, maintain, and reason about.

Olasunkanmi John Ajiboye
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 17 min read

The Replay (1/28/26): Anti-frameworkism, dev superpowers, and more

Discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the January 28th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Jan 28, 2026 ⋅ 33 sec read

Building AI apps that remember: Mem0 vs Supermemory

Compare mem0 and Supermemory to learn how modern AI apps manage long-term memory beyond RAG and stateless LLM chats.

Kapeel Kokane
Jan 26, 2026 ⋅ 9 min read
how to animate svg with css

How to animate SVG with CSS: Tutorial with examples

Animate SVGs with pure CSS: hamburger toggles, spinners, line-draw effects, and new scroll-driven animations, plus tooling tips and fallbacks.

Hope Armstrong
Jan 23, 2026 ⋅ 16 min read
View all posts

2 Replies to "Understanding React compound components"

  1. Hello!, this is a nice article, It helped me to understand this pattern a little bit better :), just one observation I have, in the code snippet you have in the article:

    “`
    const Tab = ({ id, children }) => (

    {({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}}

    );
    “`
    there is that ” > ” character in the return of the function inside that is confusing (I even thought it was a special new syntax of react…you never know! lol), then I checked the code sandbox provided, and I saw that the function was actually “({ changeTab }) => changeTab(id)}>{children}” which I was able to understand better.

    Maybe update the article’s code snippets to make it even clearer to new readers with less React experience,

    Thanks!

  2. It seems that the error on the syntax (that weird “>” character) is a problem of this CMS trying to clean up code that is being posted… uhm. well… maybe share the code snippets via https://gist.github.com instead of pasting directly in here. cheers

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now