2024-10-21
1777
#typescript
Simohamed Marhraoui
70024
Oct 21, 2024 ⋅ 6 min read

Understanding infer in TypeScript

Simohamed Marhraoui Vue and React developer | Linux enthusiast | Interested in FOSS

Recent posts:

ai dev tool power rankings

AI dev tool power rankings & comparison [Dec. 2025]

Compare the top AI development tools and models of December 2025. View updated rankings, feature breakdowns, and find the best fit for you.

Chizaram Ken
Dec 12, 2025 ⋅ 10 min read
the replay december 10

The Replay (12/10/25): Fixing AI code, over-engineering JavaScript, and more

Fixing AI code, over-engineering JavaScript, and more: discover what’s new in The Replay, LogRocket’s newsletter for dev and engineering leaders, in the December 10th issue.

Matt MacCormack
Dec 10, 2025 ⋅ 33 sec read

How to use TOON to reduce your token usage by 60%

TOON is a lightweight format designed to reduce token usage in LLM prompts. This post breaks down how it compares to JSON, where the savings come from, and when it actually helps.

Rosario De Chiara
Dec 10, 2025 ⋅ 5 min read
Fixing AI Generated Code

Fixing AI-generated code: 5 ways to debug, test, and ship safely

Andrew Evans, principal engineer and tech lead at CarMax discusses five ways to fix AI-generated code and help you debug, test, and ship safely.

Andrew Evans
Dec 10, 2025 ⋅ 9 min read
View all posts

8 Replies to "Understanding <code>infer</code> in TypeScript"

  1. A literal [ ‘hello’ , ‘world’ ] in Typescript code is by default typed as a mutable array not a readonly tuple, but you can resolve this with `as const`.

    Although it was a two-arg string array when you created it, Typescript models it as a mutable array, because you could push(), pop() and so on. One way to defeat this type-widening, alex should be declared `as const` which prevents it from being considered mutable and makes push(), pop() a compiler error so it can never vary from being a two-value tuple.

    I really liked the learning associated with infer, (for when you can’t edit the function), but for the case where you can edit the function, I think a better fix is for the person type to be asserted readonly in the first place and to use `as const` when composing person objects, which allows the original code to compile…

    function describePerson(person: Readonly<{
    name: string;
    age: number;
    hobbies: Readonly; // tuple
    }>) {
    return `${person.name} is ${person.age} years old and love ${person.hobbies.join(” and “)}.`;
    }

    const alex = {
    name: ‘Alex’,
    age: 20,
    hobbies: [‘walking’, ‘cooking’] // type is [string, string]
    } as const;

    describePerson(alex)

    Getting this right means that you haven’t type-widened the alex object, to turn e.g. hobbies into [string,string] by declaring it as a Person. When you use `as const` the hobbies property can still be inferred by the editor as being the narrower [‘walking’,’cooking’]. This has saved me a million times where compiler and editor awareness of the values is needed to guard sensitive logic. For example, some other type might be {hobby:’cooking’|’walking’, favouriteOutdoorMeals:string[]} and the compiler can know that both values of alex.hobbies fulfil the hobby value. This is not possible after type-widening them to string.

    See also https://learntypescript.dev/10/l4-readonly-function-parameters and https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/master/packages/eslint-plugin/docs/rules/prefer-readonly-parameter-types.md

    You can see the above approach in the playground https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?#code/GYVwdgxgLglg9mABAEwKYGcICcYCNUAKqW6CAFAA7GlgBciASqgIbIIA2AngDwDeAsAChEiMMwC2qeuig4wAcwDcQkc3lTRIcfizLhiABZxcuGBnpNWHHgG0Zc+QBpE9mAoC6APkWIA9L8QoEAp2VCEAX08ASkQBfSxUIKwkAAMAEl4qEgQAOjFJcMQYdEQMrJoctVRCzhYSRDh2ZERmMGb2OAA3VFLM6lyjEzN0HIArODcyACIWtpEpqPCclL1woSEIBBkW0IAPRABeWJVRCQ0AcgBBPfPHE6r6ACYABjv9QdNzRBtzgHdmdgAazc8luiHOmzgwIU53cfgCUE4VCKJTsshBzlcHgiLRKmzAMj0QjQmBw+CI2TAZABqF2USAA

  2. Thank you so much for this great article. I didn’t get a sense of “infer” from official TS guide. But here it described perfectly

  3. This is so COOL! This article let me understand the concept of ‘infer’. Thanks a lot, Marhraoui 🙂

  4. For you who need to infer Function return Promise,

    type PromiseReturnType = T extends Promise ? Return : T
    type FunctionReturnType = T extends (…args: any[]) => infer R
    ? PromiseReturnType
    : any

  5. “`
    function getFirst(arr: T): T extends [infer U, …unknown[]] ? U : never {
    return arr[0];
    }

    const firstNumber = getFirst([1, 2, 3]); // firstNumber is inferred as number
    const firstString = getFirst([‘a’, ‘b’, ‘c’]); // firstString is inferred as string
    “`
    This example is not working in TS Playground. Both variables get `never`.

    1. Hey Serg! Thanks for letting us know. We contacted the writer, and he updated the code snippet and its explanation.

Leave a Reply

Would you be interested in joining LogRocket's developer community?

Join LogRocket’s Content Advisory Board. You’ll help inform the type of content we create and get access to exclusive meetups, social accreditation, and swag.

Sign up now